LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Critics claim windmills will affect radar 

The battle over windmills off the coast of Cape Cod yesterday entered the realm of national defense, early-warning radar systems and intercontinental ballistic missiles striking the United States.

The Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound says a new Department of Defense report proves the giant 130-turbine windfarm proposal could conceivably disrupt U.S. Air Force radar systems on Cape Cod and thus Cape Wind Associates’ windmills would be “too close for comfort” for the military.

But a spokesman for the Missile Defense Agency, which authored the report, said the study clearly shows Cape Wind’s proposed off-shore turbines would be outside a proposed 25-kilometer exclusion zone.

“It’s really not considered a problem,” said Rick Lehner, the spokesman for the Missile Defense Agency, referring to the windmill plan. He noted that the Cape Cod “Pave Paws” radar system isn’t yet part of the futuristic missile defense shield envisioned one day for the nation.

Cape Wind shot back yesterday that opponents of its plan were engaging in blatant “fear mongering.”

Mark Rodgers, a Cape Wind spokesman, said past military studies have also confirmed the proposed windfarm wouldn’t impact advanced radar systems at the Air Force’s base within the Massachusetts Military Reservation.

The Missile Defense Agency report did say wind turbines could have a “significant impact” on radar performance.

But it said the Cape Wind plan was just outside the 25-kilometer zone it needs for a missile-defense system.

By Jay Fitzgerald
Boston Herald General Economics Reporter

Boston Herald

16 June 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky