[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Company answers fear over wind farm  

Suspicions that an £8million five-turbine wind farm on Nigg Hill could be the precursor to a much larger development are misplaced, it was claimed yesterday.

West Coast Energy project manager Fraser McKenzie, acting on behalf of renewables specialist Faulk Energy, which is behind the latest Nigg scheme, was responding to concerns locally that it is merely a forerunner of larger applications that would follow approval.

One nearby resident, Peter Grant, says he has been told by a member of Highland Council’s planning department that his belief Faulk’s scheme “will be followed by a phase 2 at minimum” may well be correct.

He asks why the company has applied to connect to the 33KV grid which is considerably further away than a possible 11KV connection would be.

In addition to the greater cost that would incur, he says, it would involve establishing a connection through sensitive areas, including Nigg Bay, a National Nature Reserve.

He said, “The only rational conclusion one can draw is that they seek approval of this site with the full intention of having 33KV line connections in place for later extensions.”

Responding to the claims, West Coast Energy’s Fraser McKenzie said, “We are only at the stage of gathering information for the environmental impact assessment so we cannot be absolutely certain about the number of turbines until this has been completed.

“We can, however, reassure people that our plans are for a small scale wind farm, of around five turbines, at this location and that this proposal is not a precursor for any major development.”

A spokeswoman later added that the uncertainty expressed about the number of turbines could also mean fewer than five.

A Ross-shire Journal online poll on the Nigg Hill issue shows the community split over the proposals, which have not yet reached the planning stage.

As we went to press yesterday, 181 respondents declared Nigg Hill a suitable site for a wind farm with 165 opposed.

Six said ‘maybe.

by Hector Mackenzie

Ross-shire Journal

15 June 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.