[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Lyme seeking lead agency role in Cape wind farm  

The town of Lyme is using its six-month moratorium on wind farm development, which was enacted in April, to seek control in the environmental review process for the proposed Cape Vincent Wind Farm and draft zoning regulation for turbines.

It has written the state Department of Environmental Conservation asserting that it “will act as lead agency” for any State Environmental Quality Review within its boundaries.

Cape Vincent Wind Farm, proposed by BP Alternative Energy, would place 30 to 60 turbines in Lyme and 60 to 80 in the town of Cape Vincent. The Cape Vincent Planning Board declared itself lead agency for the project’s environmental review in December.

“We are lead agency for anything that happens in the town of Lyme,” town Councilman Warren A. Johnson said.

Kimberly A. Chupa, spokeswoman for DEC, said lead agency disputes are settled by the commissioner. DEC has not yet responded to Lyme’s letter but plans to discuss its “intent” with the town, she said.

“DEC does not have a formal role in that discussion at this time and does not have the authority to intervene in the SEQR process unless there is a formal request made to the commissioner to resolve a lead agency dispute,” Ms. Chupa said.

According to DEC’s Web site, involved agencies should make a request to the commissioner to render a decision in a lead agency dispute during a 30-day period allotted for the establishment of lead agency.

Deputy Supervisor E. Norman Schreib said he was not sure what the town will do if DEC does not find Lyme should be lead agency for the portion of the project within its boundaries.

“That’s something we’d have to address at a later time,” he said.

James H. Madden, project manager for BP Alternative Energy, said the lead agency issue must be resolved before his company can move forward with the environmental review under SEQR, whether it be through the two towns or DEC.

“They’re not interested in talking to us at all until the moratorium is finished. That’s just frustrating,” Mr. Madden said.

In previous interviews, Ms. Chupa said it would be contradictory to the SEQR process to spilt BP’s project in two.

The Lyme Planning Board is using two resources to draft the regulations, Chairwoman Joan P. Mazulewicz said.

The board is looking to Clayton as an example for what zoning is appropriate for turbine development and also plans to send out a community survey regarding zoning regulations.

Questions for the survey have not been drafted, but will focus on what setbacks residents would like.

“That will dictate what we get for setbacks,” Mr. Johnson said.

Before a survey is sent, the town plans to hold an informational session on wind power development for the community, similar to what was held at Thousand Islands Central High school last winter, Mrs. Mazulewicz said.

She hopes to bring in experts Kevin R. McAuliffe of the Green & Seifter law firm, Syracuse, and Keith D. Pitman, president and CEO of Empire State Wind Energy LLC of Oneida. Mr. McAuliffe represented municipalities in Lewis County during their negotiations with Maple Ridge Wind Farm.

By Kelly Vadney

Publication: Watertown Daily Times (Watertown, NY)

Publication Date: 06/11/2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.