LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind farm developers sue county 

Portions of a county ordinance regulating the construction of wind farms make a proposed project “cost-prohibitive” and prevent the project from advancing, according to a civil suit filed recently against Manitowoc County.

Emerging Energies LLP, of Hubertus, filed the civil suit in Manitowoc County Circuit Court asking a judge to void 18 requirements in the ordinance because “they do not allow for an alternative (energy) system of comparable cost and efficiency.”

Emerging Energies is proposing a seven-turbine wind farm in the town of Mishicot. The plan has been met with criticism and in April the project was derailed after an opposition group won a civil suit filed to void a county conditional use permit granted to Emerging Energies.

Manitowoc County Circuit Judge Patrick Willis ruled that the county Board of Adjustment had failed to act “according to law” when the permit was approved because it did not apply the most recently amended version of the Manitowoc County Wind Energy Ordinance.

Emerging Energies filed its permit application in April 2005. A year later, the county Board of Supervisor’s approved an updated ordinance that took effect in May 2006.

Emerging Energies’ permit was granted in July 2006, using the ordinance in place when the application was submitted.

Willis said the Board of Adjustments must approve the permit using the new ordinance. Emerging Energies did not appeal Willis’ decision and reapplied for a new permit.

The new ordinance requires a 1,000-foot setback from a neighboring property line, a quarter-mile setback from conservancies, state or county forests, hunting areas, or parks, and a noise level not to exceed five decibels more than ambient sound.

“The requirements of the 2006 ordinance will significantly increase the cost to the plaintiff, significantly decrease the efficiency of the project, and do not serve to preserve or protect the public health and safety,” the civil suit says.

Edward J. Ritger, of Random Lake, represents Emerging Energies.

Manitowoc County Corporation Counsel Steven Rollins said he will discuss the lawsuit with the county’s Personnel Committee, which overseas the Corporation Counsel.

Rollins said he will file a written response to the suit soon after the Personnel Committee’s June meeting.

No court date has been set in the suit.

By Kevin Braley
Herald Times Reporter

htrnews.com

9 June 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon