[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Beekmantown could 'define' windfarms out  

Beekmantown officials debated wind-related laws at their most recent meeting.

The focus was this question: Why worry about regulating wind-power facilities in your community when you can keep them out until you’re sure about their impacts?

“Especially when we are so close to having a lot of towers put up,” said Beekmantown Town Supervisor Dennis Relation at a joint meeting with the Citizens Wind Advisory Committee.

“We’ll get immediate feedback.”

ALREADY RESTRICTED

In February, the seven-member Advisory Committee drafted an extensive document listing recommendations to change the zoning ordinance and a possible law to regulate wind-harvesting developments.

Later, the town passed its second moratorium on such projects.

“The moratorium is actually your status quo,” attorney Carl J. Madonna said at the meeting. “You’ve already said that, by adopting a moratorium, you’re not going to allow any more unless they come to you for a variance.”

Madonna was hired by the town because of his experience in drafting zoning laws in local municipalities.

ESSENTIAL SERVICES

However, he suggested taking just one element from the committee’s recommendations, rather than dealing with a whole separate law.

The key is to change the “essential services” label that allowed Windhorse Power LLC to secure a conditional-use permit for its 13-turbine facility.

Being deemed an essential service – necessary to the people in Beekmantown the way power and telephone lines are – allows a facility in any zoned area of Beekmantown.

The committee explained what an essential service was as a step to block any future developments from areas zoned R-2, residential.

Madonna said it could be the stop-gap the town was looking for.

“We know that this, this and this, are an essential service,” he advised the committee to say.

Instead of drafting a secondary law to allow wind turbines in select zones, a direct declaration of what constituted an essential service would keep out new facilities.

“You’ve now accomplished your purpose,” Madonna said.

But, he cautioned, “if you use those examples, then that’s all you’ve got.”

It could be unfortunate if, down the road, a use came in that the town might want or need. By then, the law would restrict the project without a use variance from the town Zoning Board.

LOSS OF FLEXIBILITY

Michael Morales, secretary of the Advisory Committee, understood what Madonna was saying.

“The negative being you lose flexibility,” Morales said.

“Yes, but on the flip side, you’re saying if it’s not there, bang, it’s not allowed,” Madonna replied.

By writing such a declaration, notably that wind turbines are not essential services in Beekmantown, the town can come back later, when a little more is known about the local impacts. Then, it can be changed, if needed.

It was something a majority of the committee would like to see, especially in light of a new report to Congress from the National Research Council of the National Academies.

“We don’t know,'” Morales summarized the study’s take on possible impacts. “It does make sense to wait. We don’t need to be part of a pilot study.”

DISSENSION

Fellow Advisory Committee member Glenn Monto disagreed with the discussion, saying the committee’s work with wind power “has been negative from the start.

“Before we do a law, we should be sure that we have a true consensus of the total community. If people are against these, pass any law you want, but if the majority of the people want these, then that’s what we should do.”

He pointed toward the Town Council, “That’s what you’re elected to do.”

“Just because the majority wants something doesn’t make it right,” Morales contested. “You look back at the civil-rights law and segregation. The majority of the South didn’t want blacks to have the type of opportunities as whites did.

“So, if it is found that there are significant adverse effects with these wind turbines and you are going to subject a certain part of your population to these effects, then it seems incumbent upon the Town Board; they’re elected to make good decisions and protect their citizens and not allow that use.”

By Lucas Blaise
Contributing Writer

pressrepublican.com

16 May 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: