[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

EFSEC: Desert Claim Wind Power Project doesn't require county approval  

The proposed Desert Claim Wind Power Project does not have to seek approval from the Kittitas County government, a state council decided Tuesday.

By a vote of 5-1, the state Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council decided the project does not have to file an application with the county because of the precedent set by an earlier EFSEC decision regarding the separate Kittitas Valley Wind Power Project, according to council chairman Jim Luce.

In a March 27 ruling on that project, a majority of council members called Kittitas County’s wind farm review ordinance flawed because it closely resembles the state EFSEC process and usurps the council’s authority, according to previous reporting in the Daily Record.

However, Luce said EFSEC expects Desert Claim to now put forward its best effort to resolve any differences that may exist with the county.

“We are continuing to encourage both parties to work together co-operatively,” he said.

EnXco USA Inc. is the parent company of Desert Claim that is seeking to build the 90-turbine wind farm eight miles northwest of Ellensburg. Luce said Desert Claim has until June 30 to decide whether or not it will seek pre-emption, which would sideline the county’s previous rejection of the project. The project would then be formally reviewed by EFSEC and the council would determine if the plan satisfies county land-use guidelines.

In a preliminary statement from Kittitas County Commission Chairman Alan Crankovich, he said he was not surprised by the EFSEC decision. He had yet to review the decision with county legal counsel and said he would address the issue more completely on Thursday.

By Patrick Carlson
Staff Writer

kvnews.com

9 May 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: