[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Glenmore to revisit wind-turbine plans  

GLENMORE – The Town Board on Thursday will discuss changing five of the 21 stipulations placed on a conditional-use permit granted to a Milwaukee-area wind-turbine company.

On March 26, the board gave the go-ahead to Hubertus-based Emerging Energies/ Shirley Wind LLC for a 30-year permit to build eight wind turbines on land owned by four families.

The 21 stipulations the board imposed included opening safety and maintenance records to the public, having a third-party electrical engineer review design and installation plans, developing a policy on handling complaints, vowing to investigate legitimate complaints and paying for a health and safety study to be done.

“We want to make sure this is pleasing to the town,” Emerging Energies principal Bill Rakocy told the board Monday, referring to developing a policy for handling residents’ complaints.

Among the changes to be discussed include:

# Payment to the community. The original stipulation said payments would start 90 days after construction begins. The revised condition says payment will be made 90 days after the turbines start operating.

# Electromagnetic communications interferences. The original condition states the wind company will eliminate any interference; the revision states it will mitigate any interference.

# Defects. The board is requesting a $20,000-per-turbine security deposit to help cover the cost of removing the turbines should they fail. The original condition stated that a turbine that failed to perform as promised would be deemed an unlawful structure and vacated or removed.

# Energy currents. Conductors will be underground, insulated and rated for the type of soil and terrain. The original condition asked that distribution lines be in a separate, approved corridor.

# Disputes. The original condition stated that parties filing complaints against the wind company waived their rights to appeal an arbitrator’s judgment; the revised wording scratches that.

Each turbine would stand 492 feet tall and operate at an optimal 2 to 3 megawatts. They would conform to the town’s wind energy ordinance, which was adopted in December.

The town is one month into a six-month moratorium on new wind-energy systems enacted in April. The moratorium is to give the town a chance to rework its wind-energy systems ordinance.

On Monday, the board changed the wording of the moratorium to include “applications received but not currently approved.”

By Lee Reinsch


9 May 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.