[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Facts on wind turbines  

Anyone doubting the futility of onshore wind farms as an effective way of reducing carbon emissions need only look at a few figures.

The three existing turbines of the Blaen Bowi wind farm near Newcastle Emlyn can generate a maximum of 3.9MW annually, a saving in CO2 emissions of 25,000 tonnes. A single jumbo jet, flying from London to Miami and back every day for 17 days, releases the climate change equivalent of 25,000 tonnes of CO2.

Thus to compensate for the damaging effects of a single jumbo jet taking this daily route for a year, Blaen Bowi would need 63 turbines to operate at maximum output. However, I understand Blaen Bowi is working at only 35 per cent of its rated output (not untypical for wind farms), so 63 turbines becomes 180 turbines running for one year to pay the environmental cost of one jumbo jet.

When planning decisions are being taken, the true cost to the local environment and the true benefit in reducing global carbon emissions should be put into honest perspective. Would the people of north Carmarthenshire be prepared to host 180 wind turbines at Blaen Bowi to offset the damaging effects of one jumbo jet?

In my opinion, onshore wind farms are just a conveniently high-profile con-trick promoted by the Government to deflect criticism of its failure to take more effective, but unpopular and expensive decisions on carbon emissions.

If we allow ourselves to be conned on this issue, we deserve both the ruined landscape and the global warming we will undoubtedly get.

Jeremy Clulow

Cwm Morgan, Newcastle Emlyn

thisissouthwales.co.uk

25 April 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter