[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Site turbines on industrial land  

While I am a lifelong conservationist and favor renewable energy, I am concerned that the windmills are being erected too hastily in our region and without long-term thought.

The Shaffer Mountain project near Ogletown is beset with issues that are counter to common sense. Windmill construction will add 20 plus miles of roads within one of the few wooded areas we have left.

Our region is coal country, so we still have a scarred landscape. No matter how one enters the forested area where these windmills are to go, one has to pass abandoned strip mines – thousands of acres, in fact.

So I have to question how “green” are efforts that clear forested acreage when these industrial wind turbines could be placed on marginal lands. The industry tells us it’s too expensive, but considering how many subsidies the wind industry is receiving in Pennsylvania, I believe they should do this right the first time. If we can put a man on the moon, surely we can put an industrial windmill on an abandoned strip mine.

This is not a “not in my back yard” mentality, because the strip mines are a mere four to five miles away from the front! The industry will tell us “there is not enough wind.” I highly question that the wind is diminished that much by a slight shift. Living here we all know how windy the stripped areas are. Has the industry ever even tested the winds on the abandoned strips?

These industrial turbines will still be in our neighborhood, if sighted on the strips, which is fine. But they would be placed on marginal land instead of in our forest. We would have renewable energy, our forest and our streams.

Dave Sewak
Windber

dailyamerican.com

13 April 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter