[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Site turbines on industrial land 

While I am a lifelong conservationist and favor renewable energy, I am concerned that the windmills are being erected too hastily in our region and without long-term thought.

The Shaffer Mountain project near Ogletown is beset with issues that are counter to common sense. Windmill construction will add 20 plus miles of roads within one of the few wooded areas we have left.

Our region is coal country, so we still have a scarred landscape. No matter how one enters the forested area where these windmills are to go, one has to pass abandoned strip mines – thousands of acres, in fact.

So I have to question how “green” are efforts that clear forested acreage when these industrial wind turbines could be placed on marginal lands. The industry tells us it’s too expensive, but considering how many subsidies the wind industry is receiving in Pennsylvania, I believe they should do this right the first time. If we can put a man on the moon, surely we can put an industrial windmill on an abandoned strip mine.

This is not a “not in my back yard” mentality, because the strip mines are a mere four to five miles away from the front! The industry will tell us “there is not enough wind.” I highly question that the wind is diminished that much by a slight shift. Living here we all know how windy the stripped areas are. Has the industry ever even tested the winds on the abandoned strips?

These industrial turbines will still be in our neighborhood, if sighted on the strips, which is fine. But they would be placed on marginal land instead of in our forest. We would have renewable energy, our forest and our streams.

Dave Sewak


13 April 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky