[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Proposed wind farm prompts setback, property concerns 

PUGWASH – With a deadline fast approaching for County council to decide on a current wind turbine bylaw proposal, residents surrounding the Pugwash Wind Farm development site are asking council to reconsider.

During an open house Wednesday night to provide information about the project, more than one concerned citizen voiced their opinion on next week’s deadline regarding the setback of wind turbines from residences.

Currently there are no bylaws pertaining to the setback from wind turbines from residences in Cumberland County. Council is proposing, however, that a distance three times the height of the turbine be in place.

Residents want more – more distance and more time.

“Let’s assume that council makes a decision to pass the bylaw that’s proposed as of today, any other input you have with us in terms of trying to defend, not defend or help you is basically bypassed by passing that bylaw,” said one local resident to Charles Demond, president of Atlantic Wind Power Corporation. “I see very little time for people to have any input to the councillors to make their desires felt or to express their reasons why they may not want it or want it.”

Local real estate business owner Peter Finley says the setbacks should be a whole lot further than what’s being proposed.

“Our major economic generator is our cottage industry. It employs more people that I can count, and it produces tax revenues that, every year are going up and up and up,” he said.

“We’ll see property values drop from 30 to 50 per cent just as soon as this wind farm project is approved. We’re already seeing those values deteriorate.”

While there are no bylaws regarding setbacks from residences, the county has a proposal of three times the height of the turbine.

Lisa Betts, a local resident who has been voicing her opinions via a weblog, says that if the county doesn’t write a good bylaw, then other counties will look at Cumberland County and adopt the same bylaw as theirs.

She would like to see a setback of at least two kilometres from any residence.

By Raissa Tetanish
The Amherst Daily News


12 April 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky