[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine developer wants to see two wind turbines in Fairhaven by autumn 

Wind turbine developer CCI Energy LLC, wants two turbines installed by this fall, and the Mass Technology Collaborative has two they need to sell.

CCI President James Sweeney told a standing room only crowd in the town hall meeting room on Wednesday night, April 4, that they are hoping to fast track the process by buying two 397-foot turbines from the MTC. The MTC faces $3,000 a month in storage costs for turbines they purchased in November 2005 after failing to find a buyer, according to Mass High Tech: The New England Journal of New England Technology.

Program Manager Nils Borgen said at the public forum that the MTC purchased the two turbines at a cost of $5.2 million to speed up the wind turbine installation process in Orleans, noting it typically takes 18 to 24 months to receive turbines from a manufacturer. Mr. Borgen said the Orleans project has taken longer than expected, and that instead of waiting for them, the MTC seeks to sell the turbines to the project best positioned to build this year.

Mr. Sweeney said he believed CCI was at the top of the list for receiving the towers. According to the MTC’s December 2006 Request for Information on their website, Orleans still plans to install in late fall 2007.

“Regardless if we get the turbines now or later, it is a good site and turbines will be put there,” said Mr. Sweeney. He was prompted by laughter from the crowd to add that town approval was necessary for the turbine installation.

CCI faces other issues besides where to buy their turbines from. Residents voiced concerns about noise from the turbines and the actual site of the turbines; possible installation places the turbines 750 feet from residences and even closer to the bike path extension. Also, residents noted, fencing will not surround the turbines, allowing people to walk right up to them.

Mr. Sweeney and Mr. Borgen were unable to give exact coordinates on the location, saying that the final decision had not been made. Opponents of the project cited data from other wind turbine projects that said ice was thrown from blades as much as 600 feet.

Representatives from CCI and the MTC said sensors would stop the blades if ice was detected or in the event of high winds.

Resident and Planning Board member Wayne Hayward reminded the crowd that the town has bylaws that determine the maximum decibel levels and setbacks for wind turbines. He said it seemed that all the information cited by CCI and the MTC follows the bylaws.

Aesthetics and property values were also an issue. Resident Henry Ferreira made reference to a statement he said he heard from New Bedford mayor Scott Lang, who said he would not subject New Bedford residents to a turbine project that looked like it came out of a futuristic movie.

“You cannot tell me something out of a Mad Max movie will raise property values,” said Mr. Ferreira, while selectman Michael Silvia quipped back “Unless you are a Mel Gibson fan.”

Residents also expressed concern over the lack of concrete contract and financial terms. Representatives from CCI and the MTC says the town should expect nearly $3 million in total financial incentives over 20 years: $100,000 per year from tax revenue and lease payments and $50,000 per year in savings from discounted energy sold by CCI to the Waste Water Treatment Plant on Arsene Street.

CCI hopes to have an article on the May 5, 2007 town meeting agenda for project approval. The decision on whether to move forward lies with the Selectmen and then Town meeting members. CCI will then have to go through approval with the town Planning Board, FAA and other agencies before the project begins.

At the conclusion of the forum, an informal show of hands showed the attendees were evenly split between support and opposition to the wind turbines.

By Kaisa Cripps
News Correspondent


12 April 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky