[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Ten more months to settle the regulations for wind power  

Wind projects were the main subject of discussion at the recent meeting of the Beekmantown Town Council.

Members of the West Beekmantown Neighborhood Association were in attendance, along with residents interested in other town matters.

The meeting opened with a public hearing on a 10-month extension to the wind-power moratorium instituted by the town last year, which had expired in March.

The moratorium had been referred to the Clinton County Planning Board, but it didn’t have a quorum at its March meeting and couldn’t conduct business. Without the Planning Board’s comments, the town wasn’t able to approve the extension.

The purpose of the moratorium has been to give the town time to complete a local law regulating wind-power facilities.

Based on the recommendations of the Citizens Wind Advisory Committee, the Town Council can draft a local law. However, little progress has been made since the council received the document in February.

“There are no changes to the zoning,” Town Supervisor Dennis Relation said.

There are plans to alter the zoning law in the coming months. Town Attorney Joseph Lavorando suggested that the process include the Town Planning Board.

Relation would like to see something changed before the local law is drafted: the allowance of “essential services” that served to bring Windhorse Power’s farm into the residentially zoned area of Rand Hill.

“There’s a possibility that we may change that before a wind-energy law is made,” Relation said.

“There is the worry that something else, maybe not wind, (will come) that will affect the town.”

The matter was tabled until the April meeting.

However, Lavorando warned against letting the local wind law be forgotten.

“What I would be afraid of is setting aside the wind-energy law to care for the ‘essential services’ part of it,” he told the council. “You need to proceed on both, would be my recommendation.”

By Lucas Blaise
Contributing Writer


10 April 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.