[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Try multi-category search (beta) »


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Morrison seeks tougher wind farm ordinance  

The Morrison Town Board has reviewed a draft ordinance on regulating wind farms and sent it back to the town’s Planning Commission to have certain areas firmed up.

Town Chairman Todd Christensen said he wants to be sure companies proposing several large wind turbines have the financial resources needed to build them correctly.

“I think we need to know that if someone starts this they can complete it,” Christensen said.

He also said he wants to be able to identify the people involved in a wind energy company and determine their track record in previous ventures.

“It is too easy (for someone) to hide behind a corporation,” Christensen said.

Town Assessor Mike Denor said he wants to be sure the town or private landowners don’t get stuck with the cost of demolishing the high-tech windmills if a wind energy firm goes out of business.

The draft ordinance called for wind energy companies to have an irrevocable letter of credit, bond or cash in escrow to cover the cost of taking down abandoned wind towers in the future.

Denor said he favored requiring cash in escrow only and Christensen agreed, questioning the value of a letter of a credit if a wind energy company was bankrupt.

Stiffening the ordinance’s requirements that a wind energy company be required to keep windmills in operating condition also was a concern raised by Christensen.

Christensen said he learned that some wind farms in California have up to 40 percent of their windmills in disrepair, including some where blades had fallen off the windmills and where the windmills were not repaired but were just left idle.

Supervisor Bruce Krahn also questioned the draft ordinance’s setback clause, saying it should apply to all buildings, not just those in which people live or work.

By Ed Byrne
Gannett Wisconsin Newspapers


10 April 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.