LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Residents learn about town's turbine planning 

Hingham residents don’t have to look far to see wind at work. Their northern neighbor Hull, after all, is a Massachusetts leader in harnessing the renewable energy source.

Looking at Hull’s success and studying Hingham’s potential, the Hingham Wind Committee and the general manager of the town’s Municipal Lighting Plant think the time is right to bring wind-generated power to town.

Last night, more than 60 people attended a forum at town hall to learn about the basics of wind energy and gain some insight into Hingham’s early planning for a turbine.

Kevin Bulman of the municipal light board said this was the first in a series of meetings to inform and involve the public.

Sally Wright of the Renewable Energy Research Lab at the University of Massachusetts presented an overview of how wind energy works and the need for renewable energy sources. She said wind energy is growing in popularity in Massachusetts because wind is the most abundant renewable energy source.

More than a dozen South Shore towns, including Braintree, Cohasset, Hanover, Kingston, Marshfield. Milton, Norwell, Pembroke, Plymouth, Scituate, Quincy and Weymouth, are in the exploratory or planning stages of using wind energy. Hull has two turbines and wants to add to that figure.

John Tzimorangas, general manager and president of the Hingham lighting plant, said six potential sites for a wind turbine have been identified in town, but he focused on three last night.

He said proponents were looking for town-owned sites where the wind would be adequate and where a turbine would not disturb residents.

Although he stressed that it was not a “˜”˜preferred” site, Tzimorangas said there is definite interest in putting a turbine on top of the capped landfill.

The Pinehills industrial area has also been mentioned, as well as South Shore Country Club.

Tzimorangas said these three locations have been mentioned in preliminary conversations with the planning and appeals boards and the building department.

Wind committee member Clayton Handleman said places like Turkey Hill and the harbor islands get a lot of wind, but turbines there could be unpopular with residents.

On the other hand, while the landfill and industrial park may not be as windy, they are far from residential areas, he said.

“˜”˜We want a project that harmonizes the town as a whole,” Handleman said.

Wright, who was asked to assess the potential sites, said research shows that all have the potential to be turbine locations. The next step would be to actually measure the wind, she said.

That would entail installing an anemometer, a device that measures wind speed. The anemometer would be put atop a thin pole about 165 feet tall. Typically, wind data is collected for 12 months.

Tzimorangas said the light board has set aside $30,000 to buy an anemometer. If the town owns an anemometer and uses it to test a site that proves unsuitable, it will be able to expedite the testing of other sites, he said.

Responding to a question from the audience about how to pay for a turbine, Tzimorangas said there would be many options to consider. Stressing the word “˜”˜probably,” he said the best way would probably be through bonding, with repayment being done with rate-payer revenue.

“˜”˜But that’s a long way off,” he said.

Tzimorangas said Wright’s presentation will soon be made available on the lighting plant’s Web site, hmlp.com.

By Karen Goulart
The Patriot Ledger

ledger.southofboston.com

5 April 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky