[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Try multi-category search (beta) »


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

How close is too close?  

How close is to close when it comes to living next door to a wind farm? It’s a question residents living along the Gulf Shore near Pugwash are trying to find out and it’s something residents living outside Amherst are going to learn when a proposed wind farm for the Tantramar Marsh takes shape next year.

While Cumberland County could have sat back and let nature take its course, it has attempted to be proactive by trying to establish a framework for just how far wind farms have to be from residential areas. To some residents, facing the real prospect of having wind turbines next door, the proposed setback guidelines are just not far enough.

When he made his presentation to council two weeks ago, county planner Jim Coughlin said he has looked at similar bylaws in other areas and has found three times the height of a turbine to be sufficient. Any further would be a waste of space.

That’s not good enough for Lisa Betts, who is calling on the county to increase the setback to two kilometres. She feels the setback should be 10 times the height of the turbine. Only then would nearby residents not have to listen to the turbine blades or be bothered by shadows cast by the turning blades.

While she may or may not be crying wolf, we have to be sure there is sufficient evidence to support the county’s proposed setbacks before it ends up with egg on its face. After all, it’s a situation that’s going to keep coming up as more developers look at the county as a location for wind farms.

The Amherst Daily News


3 April 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.