[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Labour calls for referendum 

The Shetland Labour Party has contributed to the ongoing Viking Energy windfarm consultation by suggesting a referendum to decide if local people want to receive direct financial payments from the proposed windfarm or have profits looked after for them via a trust should the scheme go ahead.

The party is also advocating transparency by the directors of Shetland Aerogenerators and Viking Energy regarding how much they stand to gain from their directorships and any other involvement in the industry.

Further issues the party believes to be of public interest include:

* The extent to which councillors are involved in the industry;
* Whether planning consent for any new sites should be considered until the future of the large central Shetland proposal is decided;
* Why councillors advocate using Shetland’s money whilst failing to achieve a controlling share.

Party vice-chairman Peter Hamilton said: “Shetland Labour Party is not taking a position either way on the proposed investment or the proposed development at this stage but feel certain issues still need clarification.

“Shetlanders are being asked to put their landscape and their money into this proposal. Our share should therefore be able to outvote the private interests of Scottish and Southern Electricity and Shetland Aerogenerators who together seemingly command 60 per cent of the project’s finances.

“While returns may be reduced by future governments, Shetland’s main source of information about this proposal comes from those with a direct stake in the venture, so it is reasonable to ask questions about the salesmen’s cut.

“Councillors also need to remember that this is not their money they are offering but money belonging to the people of Shetland, and so councillors may wish to consider how we might be independently advised during the consultation process.

“The issue of how financial returns are to be distributed needs to be addressed as there is a strength of feeling in the community that our existing oil funds are currently failing to get to those it was intended for; money which needs to be more energetically invested in Shetland’s people first and foremost.”


30 March 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky