[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Try multi-category search (beta) »


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

New turn in turbine battle  

Residents of Shipdham have another anxious wait ahead on the future of two proposed wind turbines in the village after the High Court sent its fate back into the hands of the planning inspectorate.

A government inspector granted permission for the turbines on appeal following a public inquiry last year but a condition imposed to prevent noise nuisance was challenged by Nicholas and Lee Hoare who live next to the proposed site.

At a brief hearing in London Mr Justice Lloyd Jones approved a consent order agreed between the Secretary of State, Breckland Council and developers Ecotricity, that the decision should be quashed and sent back to the Secretary of State for reconsideration on grounds that the condition was “unenforceable and imprecise” in a move that could set a new precedent for the ruling of planning permission for wind turbines.

The residents are now eager to hear what a new planning inspector decides to do with the case. He or she will take further representations from the interested parties and choose whether to simply re-write the condition, take it back to another public inquiry or completely change tack and refuse permission.

Mr Hoare told the EDP he hoped it would go back to another inquiry.

“New evidence has come out since the last inquiry that points to noise problems, particularly in the East of England,” he said. “We hope common sense prevails in the end. It does show that you can’t put these things up as near to people as the developers would like.”

John Chinery, solicitor at Breckland Council, said it could become a long drawn-out process.

“The timetable will be pushed back some months,” he said. “The inspector needs to decide whether any noise condition can be adequately drafted that would fit all the circumstances of the case. But this is far from the end of the turbines.”

A spokesman for Ecotricity said that the issue had compounded the company’s frustration over the numerous obstacles thrown in their way and the resulting delays.

She said: “We’ve just been through a process no less arduous or expensive than if we had applied to build a nuclear power station – and all for two wind turbines, it’s crazy. We just want to get on and build it.

“We hope to build this year but delays have come to so much that it will be faster and cheaper for all concerned if the decision gets passed back to the inspectorate. The inspectorate will then be able to correct any deficiency they find and reissue consent.”


28 February 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.