[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Go to multi-category search »


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Developers criticise RSPB in debate over wind farm  

The debate intensified yesterday as the deadline passed for responses to the proposal to build 181 wind turbines on the island of Lewis.

Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (Western Isles Council) will almost certainly recommend approval but it will be up to ministers to take the final decision and they will not do so until after the Scottish parliamentary elections in May.

The protagonists are giving food for ministerial thought. Last week the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), which is opposed to the £400m development, challenged the developers’ claims that the development would bring more than of 230 jobs.

Yesterday, developers Lewis Windpower, a partnership between Amec and British Energy, hit back. David Hodkinson, Lewis Windpower director, said: “It appears to us that RSPB’s attempt to discredit the work we have commissioned in respect of the economic development potential of the wind farm is a sign of their desperation to shift the debate away from the bird interests that are at the heart of their charitable status and royal charter.

“We expect one of the reasons for this is their desire to conceal their inconsistent approach to the protection of red-throated divers.

“We estimate the risk posed by the wind farm, which RSPB says would have a catastrophic’ impact on these birds, is a tiny fraction – less than 1% – of that posed by the offshore project in the Thames Estuary, which RSPB welcomed.

“We issue a challenge to RSPB to explain how they see this apparent economy with the facts fitting with their obligations as a charity.”

By David Ross
Highland Correspondent

6 February 2007


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.