[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Try multi-category search (beta) »


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Dispute flares on wind farm 'false hopes'  

A wind farm developer has been accused of raising false hopes over jobs and windfall cash in order to secure a £7million a year public subsidy.

The charge against the Anglo-Dutch consortium behind plans for a 22-turbine scheme on Lochluichart Estate was levelled by the group campaigning to block the scheme in the wake of a Meet the Buyer forum staged in Inverness by Infinergy Ltd last week.

Infinergy said 50 companies representing 5,000 employees expressed an interest in contract opportunities with the proposed wind farm, currently awaiting a determination by the Scottish Executive, which wants to see 40 per cent of the country’s electricity generated by renewable sources by 2020.

Project director Roderick Axell said, “We were extremely pleased with the event, which attracted a steady stream of people throughout the day.

“Without exception, and particularly those with experience of related technology, the attendees were very keen to be involved with the Lochluichart proposal.”

All companies attending the event have been registered on a database and will be kept up to date as the project progresses through the planning process.

But a spokesman for the campaign that aims to stop the Lochluichart proposals in its tracks, claimed Infinergy has previously stated that no more than 100 jobs will be created during the 20-month construction phase with “just a handful” of maintenance jobs sustained thereafter.

He said, “They are not after saving the planet; they are after the £7million a year in Renewable Obligation Certificate payments – basically taxpayers cash. They have not even produced details of wind speeds on the site which is a fair indication they know it’s rubbish in terms of saving greenhouse gases. They are cynically playing on people’s fears of global warming.”

And reacting to news that proposals for a second ballot of local people over the issue by Garve and District Community Council is bogged down in threats of legal action, he said it was for the community council to decide what was appropriate.

But he added, “It’s not just Garve and Achnasheen that could be effected by the outcome of a poll.

“It could effect Torridon , Ullapool and Lochbroom and all the communities in Wester Ross that depend on tourism via the main roads from Inverness.

“Who will get the £132,000 compensation payment Infinergy is offering? “Other communities will have a legitimate claim on it.

“This poll sadly has the capacity to set neighbour against neighbour.”

By Hector MacKenzie


2 February 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.