[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Island media storm over RSPB and wind farms  

A feud has broken out on a Scottish island with accusations of dirty tricks involving one of the country’s largest charities, an energy adviser to Tony Blair and some of the biggest wind power developers. At the centre of the row is the RSPB, which is accused of taking a tough line against wind farms, except for one proposed by Scottish & Southern Energy (SSE), a company with which it has a commercial relationship.

The West Highland Free Press (WHFP) newspaper highlighted the issue in a furious broadside against the bird protection charity. It accuses the charity of strongly opposing a major wind farm proposed by Amec on the Isle of Lewis while supporting an even bigger one on Shetland to be operated by SSE.

“Plans for the world’s biggest wind farm in the Shetland Islands have been met with a deafening silence from the RSPB who are the arch critics of smaller west coast projects, which many see as being in direct competition to Shetland’s 600 megawatt mega-scheme,” argues the paper under the headline “Money talks: RSPB silent on Shetland wind farm”.

The paper points out that the charity and the SSE are partners in RSPB Energy under which the bird group receives payments of £20 for every customer who switches to the RSPB Energy brand. The RSPB’s silence on Shetland is all the more curious – it argues – given how its website talks about Shetland’s “outstanding bird life” being a main attraction for visitors.

The RSPB dismissed the arguments, insisting there is no compromise. “We have not been ‘silent’ on the Shetland proposal, rather, we have indicated some support for it, albeit with caveats regarding the proposed location of some of the turbines. Our view is based on issues related to birds rather than, as suggested by the WHFP, our commercial arrangement with SSE, which we are also open about.” It pointed out that it was objecting to two smaller SSE wind power schemes elsewhere in Britain. The charity agreed that Shetland was known for its wildlife, but said the local council and the developer had consulted it at an early stage about how best to site the turbines.

Supporters of the RSPB point out that the West Highland Free Press is part-owned by Brian Wilson, a former energy minister and occasional energy adviser to Mr Blair, who is also a non-executive director of an Amec company. Mr Wilson declined to comment last night but friends pointed out that both he and the newspaper were supporters of wind energy. He never interfered in the editorial line.

Terry Macalister
Tuesday January 30, 2007


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.