[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lissett wind farm proposal backed 

Highly controversial proposals to build a wind farm of 12 turbines reaching 410 feet into the sky at the former war time Lissett airfield will be debated by councillors next week.

A planning application has been submitted by Novera Energy Limited to build the wind farm, a permanent 80m anemometer mast, a control building and a parking area at the famous World War II bomber base.

The scheme has sparked a widespread mixed reaction with hundreds of people contacting the planning authority, the East Riding of Yorkshire Council, both in support and in protest.

The application will be considered by the planning committee on Tuesday, when officers are recommending that a decision should be deferred to allow for the preparation of a legal agreement which will deal with the potential impact of interference with domestic television reception and other matters.

Provided this is satisfactorily resolved, officers are recommending that the director of customer services be authorised to grant planning permission.

The application site covers 195 hectares of the disused RAF Lissett airfield and stands 1.5 kilometres west of the village.

There are no buildings on the base but many concrete runways and taxiways remain and other parts are used for arable farming.

The proposal is for 12 wind turbines, each with a hub height of 80m and a 45m radius, featuring a three bladed rotor, giving a maximum height to the top of the vertical blades of 125m – or 410ft.

The turbines would be in two parallel lines about 400 metres apart and would be mounted on concrete bases covered with a metre of topsoil. There would also be a meteorological mast up to 80m high to collect wind data.

There would be a control building building for electrical switch gear and around three kilometres of existing runways and taxiways would be upgraded. A further 2.2km of new access track would be built.

The expected operational life of the wind farm would be 25 years and at the end of that period it would be decommissioned and the site re instated, with all above ground structures removed. Alternatively, an application could be made to retain, replace or modify the site.

The land stands within the parish of Ulrome and the Lissett and Ulrome Parish council has recommended that the planning application should be approved, although its members have asked for cabling to go underground and not on poles or pylons. Beeford Parish Council has also said no objection, as has the authority for Barmston and Fraisthorpe.

But there have been objections from Skipsea Parish Council, Foston-on-the-Wolds Parish Council and Kelk Parish Council.
The Rambers Association has also objected, claiming: “Landscape views in the countryside would be despoiled by these industrial machines which comprise a money farm for land owners and developers. Wind farms produce little power.”

A report to the committee added: “At the time of preparing this report, a total of 83 individual letters and 136 standard letters of objection had been received.”

The main concerns were:

* The disastrous visual effect on the landscape of 12 wind turbines, each approximately 410 feet tall.

* The detrimental impact on the abundant wildlife of the area.

* The noise, vibration and light pollution which would be disturbing in an otherwise tranquil area.

On the other hand, 856 individual letters of support have been received, along with 284 standard letters and a petition of 50 letters.

They point out that:

Climate change is the greatest threat facing our planet and we need renewable technology solutions such as the wind farm.

Wind power is clean.

It helps reduce the need for new nuclear power stations.
The committee report has concluded: “The proposed wind farm would provide renewable energy which is encouraged by national and local policy.

“It would not result in significant harm to the character of the landscape, open countryside, residential and visual amenity, wildlife and communications.

“There are no technical reasons not to grant consent.
The proposal complies with policy and is therefore recommended for approval.”
26 January 2007


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky