LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Ofgem attacks carbon-cutting subsidies 

Investors in renewable energy are profiting from a government-backed subsidy regime at the expense of taxpayers, the energy regulator Ofgem argued yesterday.

Calling for an overhaul, the watchdog complained the system was a “very expensive way of reducing carbon emissions compared to other alternatives”.

Alistair Buchanan, chief executive of Ofgem, said: “We support emphatically the government’s aim of cutting carbon emissions and recognise that renewable generation has a part to play in achieving that aim. But we think that a review of the scheme could provide more carbon reductions and promote renewable generation at a lower cost to customers, who are already facing higher energy bills.”

According to Ofgem’s analysis, the cost per tonne of carbon saved under the current subsidy regime is £184 to £481. This is much higher than the costs of other policy measures, such as the European Union’s emissions trading scheme, at £12 to £70 a tonne, the climate change levy at £18 to £40 a tonne, and the energy efficiency commitment, which ranges from bringing a benefit to a cost of £60 a tonne.

Calling for the system to be replaced, Ofgem said it was “leading to much higher returns for current renewable generators than investors expected or required”.

At present, companies producing electricity from renewable sources such as wind, landfill gas and biomass – fuel derived from plants or animal waste that is burned with fossil fuels such as coal – qualify for “renewable obligation certificates” or ROCs. Under a rule known as the renewable obligation, suppliers must generate a certain amount of their output from renewable sources and they can purchase ROCs from wind farms and other renewable suppliers to make up this amount.

However, the price of a ROC, currently about £40, is linked to the wholesale electricity price. This means that if the price of electricity is high, as it is at present, renewable companies can profit doubly, both selling their electricity for more money and also receiving highly valued ROCs which they sell to generators.

Ofgem argues that this link with the wholesale electricity price should be broken to stop renewable companies making such high profits from subsidies. Its preferred option is a system that would see renewable generators selling their electricity to suppliers based on long-term contracts, containing a fixed subsidy value.

But wind companies said the government risked alarming investors in renewable energy if it changed the subsidy rules.

They claimed that changing the rules now would make it impossible for the government to meet its target of generating 10 per cent of electricity from renewable sources by 2010. At present, about 5 per cent comes from renewables.

While admitting that high electricity prices were the main reason for the extensive profits to be made from renewable generation, the regulator said that electricity prices would have to fall steeply to make ROCs good value for money for the taxpayer.

By Fiona Harvey,Environment Correspondent

Published: January 23 2007

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2007

ft.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky