LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind turbine request stalled 

Wendie Howland’s plan to construct a 120-foot wind turbine on the highest point of Pocasset encountered rough going with the Bourne Appeals Board Wednesday night, and she withdrew her height-variance request without prejudice.
Howland’s neighbors and abutters rallied around her request and her plan to erect a 10-kilowatt structure of galvanized steel on her property off Barlows Landing Road.
Appeals board members Robert Gaynor and Judith Riordan said they are alternative energy enthusiasts but also said the Howland project was a much broader than a simple request for a variance of the bylaw restricting structures to 40 feet.
The planning board weighed in, saying any approval of the Howland turbine could be precedent-setting and would not be in Bourne’s best interest because Town Meeting in May still has to consider a wind-turbine control bylaw amendment.
Gaynor said bylaw review should come first. He said he does not want to see turbines all across town with a resulting “visual contamination.”
Riordan said the town is “trying to establish process and procedure” on wind turbines and the effort should be supported. She said Howland’s project and her variance request represents a balance between community rights and those of the property owner.
Town Planner Coreen Moore suggested conditions should the appeals board lean toward granting Howland’s height variance request. She said the conditions are needed, not so much to protect neighbors as to protect the interest of buyers moving in and not realizing the Howland structure might fall on their land one day.
Howland reminded appeals board members that her request was for a zoning variance on the height restriction; “nothing else,” she said. She said she stands to lose $47,500 in an alternative energy subsidy if the plan does not proceed by March. She said reducing her electric energy bills now would help her live reasonably well in her old age and enjoy her home.
The appeals board was not persuaded. So Howland withdrew her request.

By Paul Gately

townonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon