[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbine request stalled  

Wendie Howland’s plan to construct a 120-foot wind turbine on the highest point of Pocasset encountered rough going with the Bourne Appeals Board Wednesday night, and she withdrew her height-variance request without prejudice.
Howland’s neighbors and abutters rallied around her request and her plan to erect a 10-kilowatt structure of galvanized steel on her property off Barlows Landing Road.
Appeals board members Robert Gaynor and Judith Riordan said they are alternative energy enthusiasts but also said the Howland project was a much broader than a simple request for a variance of the bylaw restricting structures to 40 feet.
The planning board weighed in, saying any approval of the Howland turbine could be precedent-setting and would not be in Bourne’s best interest because Town Meeting in May still has to consider a wind-turbine control bylaw amendment.
Gaynor said bylaw review should come first. He said he does not want to see turbines all across town with a resulting “visual contamination.”
Riordan said the town is “trying to establish process and procedure” on wind turbines and the effort should be supported. She said Howland’s project and her variance request represents a balance between community rights and those of the property owner.
Town Planner Coreen Moore suggested conditions should the appeals board lean toward granting Howland’s height variance request. She said the conditions are needed, not so much to protect neighbors as to protect the interest of buyers moving in and not realizing the Howland structure might fall on their land one day.
Howland reminded appeals board members that her request was for a zoning variance on the height restriction; “nothing else,” she said. She said she stands to lose $47,500 in an alternative energy subsidy if the plan does not proceed by March. She said reducing her electric energy bills now would help her live reasonably well in her old age and enjoy her home.
The appeals board was not persuaded. So Howland withdrew her request.

By Paul Gately


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.