[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Try multi-category search (beta) »


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Rejection urged for inland turbines  

Approval for the world’s biggest wind-farm off the south coast of England yesterday sparked calls to halt new inland schemes in the North.

The Department of Trade and Industry yesterday gave the green light to the London Array, which will be built 12 miles out to sea.

With 341 turbines, the £1.5bn bid could generate up to 10% of the UK Government’s 2010 green energy targets.

And a second £500m windfarm, also off the coast of Kent, will add a further 100 turbines.

North-East protesters who are fighting a raft of separate bids across the region say a local offshore alternative should be fully explored before any turbines are placed on terra firma.

“We’ve said all along that windfarms should be offshore,” said South Charlton farmer Robert Thorpe, who is fighting plans to put 24 turbines at Middlemoor, just north of Alnwick, Northumberland.

“It makes far more sense to put the turbines out at sea, both visually and operationally, instead of ruining our beautiful landscape.

“Offshore, they can be as big as you like without affecting anyone, as well as more economic.

“We would call on the DTI – which is currently considering the Middlemoor application – to call a halt on all onshore wind-farm development here in the North-East, so that an offshore alternative can be investigated.”

Don Brownlow, a member of the Moorsyde Action Group, added: “We’re facing three separate applications within a few miles of each other near Berwick, at Moorsyde, Toft Hill and Barmoor, totalling 26 turbines.

“It makes no sense at all, when we could be putting them all offshore.”

By Robert Brooks, The Journal


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.