[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Windmill debate grows heated  

Shade Township’s public discussion of a proposed windmill ordinance Thursday wasn’t supposed to be a rehash of the pros and cons of wind energy.

So much for that.

With so much at stake ““ millions of dollars, ridges and watersheds ““ and so much conflicting information available on wind power, residents and a few associated with wind power development made their positions clear.

Sneers and jeers were part of the process.

Turbine opponents cackled, for instance, when a township resident presented a study that windmills could improve property values. And a windmill proponent whispered demeaning comments under his breath at pleading property owners.

A Somerset man involved in windmill development argued that turbines create jobs, including four permanent ones from the 34 turbines erected so far.

And, he said the township’s draft ordinance takes away small landowners’ chances at getting in on wind development.

The draft ordinance differs from the county ordinance in its setback regulations, details of which are at the township office.

Pete Weaver stood to claim that his rights as a property owner will be violated with churning turbines nearby.

“I bought acreage for my retirement home, and I thought my dream had come true,” he said. “Now, I see it’s going to be devastated. It’s callous disregard.”

Gamesa project developer Tim Vought urged supervisors to look at more lenient models and said no turbines have been erected since the county imposed an ordinance, the first of its kind. He confirmed Gamesa is planning up to 30 turbines on township ridges.

The township is accepting written comments until 3 p.m. Nov. 3.

BY Kecia Bal
The Tribune-Democrat


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.