LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

I-937 is an unnecessary, costly government order 

If voters approve Initiative 937 in November, your utility bills will go up. That’s enough reason to vote “no” on I-937, but the mandates in the initiative also are unnecessary for Washingtonians to enjoy clean, renewable energy. Here’s why.

Initiative 937 would force every utility with more than 25,000 customers to acquire 15 percent of its electric energy from a limited list of nonhydropower renewable energy sources by 2020 or pay steep fines and penalties.

Proponents will try to tell you this is the only way to ensure “a clean energy future for Washington,” but what they don’t tell you is that Washington already leads the nation in clean energy.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington’s electric industry is ranked 49th lowest in carbon dioxide emissions in the nation! Only Vermont has lower emissions. Nearly 70 percent of our state’s electricity is generated by clean, renewable hydropower – a proven, renewable energy source that proponents intentionally excluded as an approved renewable resource under I-937.

When you cut to the chase,

I-937 is about mandating more wind power – the only proven technology in Washington that qualifies under the measure.

Not surprisingly, the companies that build wind turbines and wind farms have contributed heavily to the million-dollar-plus campaign for I-937. They claim it will save us money, but the facts say something else.

According the Northwest Power and Conservation Council, the cost of building and operating wind farms has increased by as much as 70 percent in the last two years. The council reports that the cost of recent wind projects now ranges from $72 to $98 a megawatt hour. By comparison, the cost of existing hydropower is under $30.

So, here’s the bottom line: I-937 will force Washington utilities to sell some of their lower-cost hydropower to California – where it counts as a renewable energy source – in order to build required, higher-cost wind farms. That’s right! Californians will benefit while Washingtonians pay.

The nonpartisan Washington Research Council estimates I-937 will increase utility rates and taxes in Washington by $185 million to $370 million a year. And they conclude I-937 will cost Washington btween 3,600 and 7,100 jobs because of those increased energy costs.

And it could get even more expensive. A federal subsidy for wind power will expire in 2007. If Congress fails to renew the federal production tax credit, the price of wind power will jump another $19 a megawatt hour.

I-937 might seem like a good idea, but it doesn’t make any sense for Washington. Another problem is that wind is an intermittent resource. The wind only blows one-fourth to one-third of the time. The rest of the time, the turbines are idle – consuming rather than producing energy. The American Wind Energy Association ranks Washington 24th in wind capacity, worst in the

Northwest, calling into question whether a 15 percent mandate can be met.

Washington is already a clean, renewable energy state. And our individual utilities are already building wind farms, when and where it makes economic and environmental sense. I-937 will force utilities to make bad decisions and cost us millions of dollars. Vote No on I-937.

Michael B. Early is executive director of Industrial Customers of Northwest Utilities.

159.54.227.3

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky