[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

TrustPower wind farm application suspended  

odt.co.nz

TrustPower’s application to establish a $600 million wind farm near Lake Mahinerangi has been temporarily suspended.

The company had asked for the resource consent application it lodged in June to be suspended and intended to replace it with a modified consent “within weeks”, TrustPower community relations manager Graeme Purches said last night.

TrustPower was seeking permission from the Dunedin City Council, Clutha District Council and Otago Regional Council to erect up to 150 wind turbines, each up to 45 storeys high, on a 3260ha site southwest of Dunedin.

Construction of the turbines would involve 150 workers bulldozing 80km of tracks and shifting up to 2.4 million cu m of soil.

The wind farm would generate enough electricity to power 150,000 households.

The proposal was strongly opposed by a group of environments and farmers, who formed the Upland Landscape Protection Society and geared themselves up for a protracted fight.

Asked last night if the modified consent would be for a smaller wind farm with fewer turbines, Mr Purches would not comment.

TrustPower was still “absolutely committed” to a wind farm at Mahinerangi, he said.

The company had asked the councils to delay publicly advertising the application until the modifications could be lodged, he said.

“The application needs to be in the form in which it will proceed, otherwise it is a waste of time and resources for everyone.”

Applications were not often suspended, city council resource consents manager Alan Worthington said yesterday.

Suspending an application meant it was in limbo until the applicant chose to reactivate it or withdraw it, he said. There was no time limit for the applicant to make that decision.

By Allison Rudd

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter