[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Appeal over wind farm substation  


The consortium planning to build the world’s largest offshore wind farm is appealing against the refusal of permission for an onshore substation.

The proposed substation at Cleve Hill, Graveney, Kent, forms part of the £1.5bn London Array scheme to site 270 wind turbines off the Thanet coast.

Swale Borough Council refused planning consent in June, citing environmental impact as the reason.

Andrew Murfin, of London Array, said Cleve Hill remained the best location.

Impact on community

“We firmly believe this is an excellent project, and the Cleve Hill remains the only location that minimises environmental concerns while meeting the necessary technical criteria for such a critical element of the project,” he said.

The substation is needed to bring the electricity ashore to feed into the national grid.

If built, it would supply enough clean energy to meet the electricity consumption of every house in Kent and East Sussex.

Mark Bilsborough, of Swale Borough Council, said on Tuesday that although it was an exciting project and that Swale was not against change, significant local concerns remained.

‘Concerns addressed’

He said 60 heavy lorry movements a day for five years through a small village on winding country lanes “was too much for a small rural community to take”.

He said: “If London Array can satisfy the local community in Graveney that the disruption caused by such a major infrastructure will be minimised – and that the compensation package they have put together is adequate – then they will have a much better chance of getting their project approved.”

London Array said it had now amended its proposals, after listening to local residents, to address concerns over the impact of construction traffic and the visual impact of the substation.

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.