[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind could shift in Buzzards Bay  


By David Schoetz
Staff Writer

The phrase ”not permittable” is typically the last thing a developer wants to hear.

But that’s exactly what the state environmental office has called Boston construction magnate Jay Cashman’s proposal to build a 120-turbine offshore wind farm in three clustered Buzzards Bay sites.

If Cashman wants to pursue his renewable energy plan, he ”proceeds at the risk of denial” because the sites fall within the Cape and Islands Ocean Sanctuary, according to a certificate written by former Secretary of Environmental Affairs Stephen Pritchard that lays out the state’s scope of review over the project.

The construction of offshore ”electric generating stations” is legally restricted inside the five state-designated ocean sanctuaries.

Pritchard, who recently left his environmental post to work on Gov. Mitt Romney’s Big Dig safety review, also noted that Cashman’s sites are home to a primary nesting area for the federally endangered roseate tern, as well as other threatened bird species.

Yesterday, a spokesman for Cashman said the state’s concerns came as no surprise.

”It wasn’t unexpected, so it doesn’t really deter us,” said Todd Presson, director of wind energy development for Patriot Renewables, the renewable energy subsidiary of Jay Cashman Inc. ”It lays out a little more clearly what we need to do and the questions we need to answer in order for a project like this to go ahead.” The Buzzards Bay project would include three clusters of turbines off Fairhaven, Dartmouth and Naushon Island, one of the Elizabeth Islands.

The state first raised concerns about the sanctuary status at a Fairhaven public hearing in July. At the time, Cashman said the project might be permittable under a section of the sanctuary act that allows offshore power cables and gas pipelines.

In his 23-page report, Pritchard flatly ruled that Cashman’s proposal did not fall into that category.

Still, Presson said the law is unclear and that some state lawmakers are pushing legislation that might establish improved guidelines for offshore renewable projects within sanctuary areas.

”Clearly there’s some ambiguity in the law that we’re going to have to address,” he said.

State Sen. Robert O’Leary, D-Barnstable, has been pushing ocean management legislation on Beacon Hill since 2005. His bill passed the Senate in July but did not pass the House before the legislative session ended.

Last night, he said his bill would allow only small-scale renewable energy projects in the designated waters.

”No one would define the Cashman project as small-scale,” O’Leary said, adding that amending his bill to accommodate the developer’s proposal would be ”a mistake.”

The other option, he said, would be for Cashman to seek legislation specifically approving the proposal – a move the senator called ”a Pandora’s box.”

The Cape Wind proposal, which would include 130 turbines in the federal waters of Nantucket Sound, has not faced the same hurdle at the state level.

”The issues the Cashman site are dealing with right now are not the same as the Cape Wind project,” explained Cape Wind spokesman Mark Rodgers. ”The federal portions of Nantucket Sound are not part of the Cape and Islands Ocean Sanctuary.”

Cashman has said that Cape Wind developer Jim Gordon’s site is the best location for an offshore wind farm along the Massachusetts coastline because of the winds, the shallow ocean depths and the footprints federal status.

The Buzzards Bay developer has a personal interest in the Cape Wind proposal, which remains under federal, state and local review. If Cape Wind ultimately did receive permits to move forward, Cashman, who has a home in West Falmouth, has expressed interest in overseeing construction.

Seth Kaplan, a senior attorney at the Conservation Law Foundation, said Cashman’s Buzzards Bay proposal demonstrates the need for state officials to update and clarify the 35-year old Ocean Sanctuaries Act. The outlook for Cashman under the current law, he added, will likely make financing the $750 million project a particular burden.

The next step for Cashman, according to environmental affairs spokesman Vanessa Gulati, would be filing a draft environmental report that addresses the issues raised in the state report.

Presson, the project’s spokesman, said some of the research the state has requested – including bird studies – is already under way. ”We’re not slowing down,” he said.

David Schoetz can be reached at dschoetz@capecodonline.com.

(Published: August 22, 2006)

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.