LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Coastal wind farm would destroy bird haven say protesters 

Credit:  By Chris Logan (Filed: 31/08/2004) telegraph.co.uk ~~

Plans to build a wind farm on the edge of one of Britain’s most important bird sanctuaries have raised fears that the area could be destroyed as a haven for wildlife.

The 12 turbines 380-feet high would stand on a stretch of coast visited by a huge number of waterbirds that feed on its mudflats and salt marshes.

Migrating flocks also fly over the area and opponents of the scheme fear many birds could be killed by the rotor blades of the turbines.

Developers say they chose the site – overlooking Bridgwater Bay in Somerset – partly because it is close to the Hinkley Point nuclear power station and the landscape would not be spoiled.

Nearby residents, including many who work at Hinkley, were appalled by the plan. They said the turbines would tower above the power station and kill or scare off birds.

Bridgwater Bay is recognised as an area of special scientific interest and is part of the Severn Estuary area of special protection under British and European law, mainly because of the rich birdlife.

Nightingales breed on farmland adjoining the coast.

Bob Corns, a spokesman for English Nature, said: “It’s about as heavily protected an area as we have in Britain.

Migrating birds such as swallows and housemartins use this coastline and they could be at risk from the rotors, particularly at night. Some of the turbines would be within 100 yards of the nature reserve.

“Something like 35,000 waterbirds are in the bay during an average winter and the wind farm could disturb birds feeding on the mudflats.”

Richard Archer, of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, said: “The noise and disturbance is the problem.

This is an internationally recognised spot for birdlife. A couple of the proposed turbines would overlook a sandy feeding area and we’d be much happier if they were moved back.”

Michael Howard, the Conservative leader, has pledged that a Tory government would give communities more say in the siting of wind farms. He has accused Labour of “pressing ahead regardless” to encourage wind turbines.

The government is committed to increasing the amount of power from renewable sources. David Bellamy, the naturalist and broadcaster, is among a growing number who have challenged the policy, arguing that wind turbines “chop up birds”.

Campaigners in Somerset said they were angry with Your Energy, the developers, and Lady Gass, the Lord Lieutenant of the county and the owner of the land where most of the turbines would be built.

“We’re surprised Lady Gass has entered into such a deal,” said Dick Jones, whose home in Knighton would be only a few hundred yards from the nearest turbine.

“She purports to be a custodian of the countryside but these turbines will wreck it. They will be monumental, among the biggest in Europe. We’re very worried about the constant low-frequency noise they generate.”

John Lucas, a retired police officer from Shurton, said he would put up with the turbines if they were efficient. “But they just don’t do the job,” he said. “They require back-up.

Even with the power station this is one of the few relatively unspoilt stretches of coastline left in Somerset and these turbines will have an enormous visual impact.”

Peter Farmery, a retired engineer, accused Lady Gass of selling her birthright. Lady Gass declined to comment but her land agent, David Barke, said: “Lady Gass believes we must look at alternative sources of power.

The wind farm would be close to the hideous bulk of Hinkley so it’s not going to detract from the landscape.”

[rest of article available at source]

Source:  By Chris Logan (Filed: 31/08/2004) telegraph.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky