ISSUES/LOCATIONS

Documents Home
View PDF, DOC, PPT, and XLS files on line
RSS

Add NWW documents to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

News Watch

Selected Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Submission to the Planning Assessment Commission re Gullen Range  

Author:  | Aesthetics, Australia, Impacts, Noise, Property values

Contents

Summary and recommendations … 5

On what terms should this modification application be determined? … 10

Verification of wind turbine locations … 13
– The surveys … 13
– The turbine relocations and the Department’s response to them … 14
– The absurdities within the Department’s position … 21

Visual impact … 23
– The public domain … 23
– Residences23
– Principles for a more adequate assessment of visual impact … 25
– Discussion and conclusions … 40

Noise … 44
– The deficiencies of the South Australian Noise Guidelines (2003) … 44
– The Department’s new noise conditions … 46
– Cooper’s research for Pacific Hydro at Cape Bridgewater … 50
– Waterloo noise monitoring by Hansen and colleagues … 51
– B29: background noise levels … 54
– Discussion and conclusions … 55

Other issues … 59
– Shadow flicker … 59
– Health … 59

Property value … 61

Turbine spacing … 63

Parkesbourne/Mummel Landscape Guardians Submission to the Planning Assessment Commission re Gullen Range Wind Farm Modification Application MP 07_0118 MOD 1

This article is the work of the author(s) indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter