| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Rebuttal testimony of Thomas Hewson Jr.
Author: | Economics, Filings, Maine
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
In the filed summary statements by the applicant, Conservation Law Foundation and Ed Holt & Associates, challenges were made to my filed and direct testimony provided to the Commission on behalf of the Friends of the Western Mountains. They challenged my four major findings, namely:
• Project power output estimates unsupported and likely overstated
• No demonstrated need for the Redington Mountain Wind project
• Project’s local economic impacts unstudied with no examination of offsetting economic costs
• Project will provide no incremental air pollution benefits
I found their arguments off target and misleading. I continue to stand by each finding …
Download original document: “REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF THOMAS HEWSON JR. (ENERGY VENTURES ANALYSIS INC)”
This material is the work of the author(s) indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this material resides with the author(s). As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Queries e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Paypal) |
 (via Stripe) |
Share:
[ Short URLs: https://wind-watch.org/doc/?p=203 | http://wndfo.net/D203 ]
Tags: Wind power, Wind energy
