LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Project manager says Spruce Ridge Wind Farm proposal likely to return 

Credit:  By JOHN KOZIOL, Union Leader Correspondent | April 24, 2017 | www.newhampshire.com ~~

ALEXANDRIA – Interconnection Queue, a representative of Energias de Portugal (EDP), said the proposed Spruce Ridge Wind Farm – which calls for as many as 29 turbines in the Newfound Lake/Cardigan Mountain region – is not dead and will likely return.

Through its subsidiary, EDP Renewables of Houston, Texas, the company wants to build wind turbines in the northern and western portions of the Newfound Lake watershed in Alexandria, Canaan, Dorchester, Groton and Orange.

In March, the company withdrew a bond for the construction of a meteorological tower in Alexandria. The tower would have helped EDP determine the project’s overall viability as well as the optimal siting for the turbines.

The action generated speculation that Spruce Ridge was in trouble, something that received more weight when on April 10 EDP gave up its place on the ISO-NE Interconnection Queue. The Spruce Ridge Wind Farm was the 390th request out of 640 in the queue.

Jeffrey Nemeth, who is the Spruce Ridge project manager, said during a telephone interview on Monday it was premature to say Spruce Ridge was dead, and that it was “very possible that they (the five proposed siting communities) will see the company again.”

There was no time-frame yet for EDP to return to the communities, said Nemeth, who downplayed the significance of what opponents such as the New Hampshire Wind Watch said was Spruce Ridge’s demise when it was taken out of the ISO-NE queue.

“If you’re familiar with the ISO-NE process, you need to hit certain milestones to continue with the process” of having an energy project connected into the New England power grid, Nemeth said.

While not saying what the milestones were or the reason for the failure to achieve them, Nemeth said “getting back into the queue process would be just having us submit an interconnection request to NE-ISO.”

Larry Goodman of NH Wind Watch said Spruce Ridge’s return is not that straightforward.

For starters, voters in each of the siting communities have voted overwhelmingly against the Spruce Ridge project, said Goodman, who added that “Once a company withdraws from the ISO-NE Queue it costs time and money to get back in and start from scratch.”

Nemeth’s saying that Spruce Ridge will be back doesn’t answer the questions of why it was pulled from the ISO-NE queue, said Goodman, or why the meteorological tower was scrubbed.

The New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee wants the data from the tower, he continued, but so far, the committee has only negative endorsements for Spruce Ridge from the siting communities as well as four abutting towns.

“There is not a community here that wants their 500-foot turbines,” said Goodman, who wondered why EDP Renewables would “voluntarily start over again on a wind plant that has been resoundingly rejected by voters. The community sentiment only gets stronger, and the resolve to reject and fight this industrial blight, as most voters evidently see it, only gets stronger.”

Source:  By JOHN KOZIOL, Union Leader Correspondent | April 24, 2017 | www.newhampshire.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky