LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Turbines are refused over visual impact 

Credit:  Bridlington Free Press | 09 June 2016 | www.bridlingtonfreepress.co.uk ~~

Two applications to construct wind turbines near Bridlington have been turned down by the Planning Inspectorate after an appeal.

Two appeals were lodged against East Riding of Yorkshire Council’s decision to refuse permission to build two turbines at Barmston.

But the Planning Inspectorate dismissed them, because of the “impact the development would have on the character and visual amenity of the surrounding area”.

He added: “There are two significant wind farms in view from much of the immediate area.

“These are the 12 turbines at Lissett and the nine turbines at Fraisthorpe.

“Turning to visual amenity this site would be visible from a number of local public rights of way.”

The Inspectorate added that the turbines would add “visual and distracting clutter to the setting of Burton Agnes Hall, and that the setting is an important part of the significance of the property.

“The harm would be less than substantial, but even so carries great weight in the planning balance.

“There are also objections from other organisations and individuals in the area, though some do not object.

“For the reasons above I conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.”

Among those objecting was Jo Benson, of Goose Island Farm at Dringhoe, near Driffield.

She said: “I see no need to add any more turbines as these together with farm turbines are already causing severe accumulative impact.

“Since this application went to planning the landscape has changed with considerably more farm turbines in the locality.”

Source:  Bridlington Free Press | 09 June 2016 | www.bridlingtonfreepress.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky