LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

The no-build zone on your land, courtesy of clean, peaceful wind power 

Credit:  By Patrick McIlheran of the Journal Sentinel, www.jsonline.com 1 February 2011 ~~

When I wrote last week about what neighbors of utility-scale wind farms are hearing, I noted that distance from a wind turbine counts. The farther your house is from where a turbine suddenly gets built, the less likely the jet-plane-like sound will mess up your life.

That’s the main reason people living amid wind turbines say they support Gov. Scott Walker’s move to increase the distance wind developers must put their turbines from neighbors unless the neighbors grant permission. The setback in state regulators’ rules due to go into effect soon is that windmills must be at least 1,250 feet from a neighboring home; Walker’s rules say that unless neighbors give their consent, a wind turbine must be at least 1,800 feet from a neighbor’s property line.

Which brings up another distinction, say wind-farm critics. The Public Service Commission rules that specify 1,250 feet from a house also say the wind turbine must be 1.1 times its height from any property lines – meaning, for a typical wind turbine, 440 feet from the border. This means that the safety zone, a circle around a turbine of 1,250 feet radius, in which no dwelling can be built, sweeps over onto a neighbor’s property. So while the neighbor’s house is outside that 1,250 radius, a swath of his backyard is not. It becomes, whether he consents or not, a no-build zone. Turbine critics point out to me this means no garages within that zone. No other structures, either, if you want your insurer to cover them.

Walker’s proposal, by contrast, specifies a distance from the property line. That means that wind turbine builders cannot commandeer a part of the neighbors’ land as a safety zone around their machine.

Source:  By Patrick McIlheran of the Journal Sentinel, www.jsonline.com 1 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky