Noise study may be Hammond’s next step
Credit: By Matt McAllister, The Journal, www.ogd.com 10 August 2010 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
HAMMOND – After four months of meetings, the Hammond Wind Advisory committee made its first recommendation to the Hammond Town Board: to ask for funding for an ambient noise study to be conducted throughout the proposed wind overlay district for the town.
Wind committee facilitator, David B. Duff, told the town board that his committee was struggling to decide between relative noise standards and fixed noise standards. He said the committee was “confused” as to precisely what the ambient – or existing, background noise – sound level was in Hammond. Mr. Duff also said that the committee, as a whole, had not yet decided between setting site specific noise and setback standards or “average” noise standards that could be used as a blanket policy for the town.
Mr. Duff said that ambient sound levels throughout Hammond would “vary depending on location.”
Supervisor Ronald W. Bertram said his research showed that sound studies could be very expensive, to which Mr. Duff countered with another proposal.
“I anticipated the board’s answer,” Mr. Duff said, “and took it upon myself to make some inquiries.”
According to Mr. Duff, two sound specialists, Charles Ebbing and Clif Schneider – who have each made presentations to the wind committee – have offered their courtesy assistance in undertaking such a sound study.
“They are willing to loan us an instrument (to measure ambient sound), and to train committee members on how best to conduct such a study,” Mr. Duff said, noting that, “while there is nothing scientific about it, it is a freebie.”
Mr. Duff said the pair are willing to set a date and time to meet representatives of the committee in Clayton – and anyone else from the community who is interested in either learning more or assisting the wind committee in conducting the study – for a couple hours of sound measuring education.
Mr. Bertram instructed Mr. Duff to take the discussion back to the wind committee.
“We’ll see where it goes from there,” Mr. Bertram said.
The sound study endeavor, Mr. Bertram said, might be a good way to get wind committee applicants who were not selected onto the committee involved in the process. Applicants not selected to the committee included Sonja Kocan, Nancy Chase, Jay Benton, Steven White, Ann Root, Thomas Chapman, Jim Misenko, Mary Hamilton, Howard Demick, Larry Fuller, and Kelly Rogers.
The wind committee, composed of Leonard Bickelhaupt, Allan P. Newell, Frederick A. Proven, Dr. Stephen D. Sarfaty, Michele W. McQueer, Richard Champany, Don A. Ceresoli Jr., Merritt V. Young, Ronald Papke, and Rudolph Schneider, will meet again on Monday at 7 p.m. in the village hall.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=40959 ]
