Renewable portfolio standard: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==''See also:''== | ==''See also:''== | ||
* [[Renewable energy | * [[Renewable energy certificates]] | ||
* [[Feed-in tariff]] | * [[Feed-in tariff]] | ||
* [[Production tax credit]] | * [[Production tax credit]] |
Revision as of 17:42, 1 October 2017
Many countries (and states in the USA) require utilities to buy a specified amount of their electricity from designated “renewable” sources, such as wind and solar but usually excluding existing hydro. This is called a “renewable portfolio standard” (RPS), “renewable electricity standard”, or “renewables obligation”.
Such a directive has little regard for cost, practicality, or science but is instead primarily an act of political virtue signalling.
Or it is a cynical act of crony capitalism: Besides placing burdens on utilities and ratepayers, an RPS serves to create a obligatory market for energy sources that would otherwise find it difficult to compete with more reliable and cheaper sources. Combined with subsidies, e.g., PTC, Feed-in tariff and the extra market for “green tags”, an RPS helps to guarantee attractive returns and tax avoidance for the investors in these “preferred” technologies.