Renewable energy certificates: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The RECs allow their buyer to claim that their electricity comes from that specific source, even though all sources feed into the vast pool of the [[electrical grid]] and every user on that grid gets their electricity from the same mix of sources. | The RECs allow their buyer to claim that their electricity comes from that specific source, even though all sources feed into the vast pool of the [[electrical grid]] and every user on that grid gets their electricity from the same mix of sources. | ||
RECs are obviously worthless, a blatant monetization of “[[wikipedia:Virtue_signalling|virtue | RECs are obviously worthless, a blatant monetization of “[[wikipedia:Virtue_signalling|virtue signaling]]” (and of false virtue at that<ref>[[Carbon emissions]]</ref>). | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 13:10, 12 October 2017
Invented by Enron in 1997 to make their acquisition of the Zond wind energy company profitable, renewable energy certificates (RECs, called “green tags” by Enron and “renewables obligation certificates” [ROCs] in many countries) represent the “environmental benefit” of electricity sources deemed to be “green”. They are sold apart from and in addition to the actual energy.
The RECs allow their buyer to claim that their electricity comes from that specific source, even though all sources feed into the vast pool of the electrical grid and every user on that grid gets their electricity from the same mix of sources.
RECs are obviously worthless, a blatant monetization of “virtue signaling” (and of false virtue at that[1]).