Curtailment: Difference between revisions

From Wind Watch Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
Because of [[Feed-in tariff|laws]] requiring the grid to accept all wind power, the wind companies are paid for this curtailment as if they had nonetheless contributed power to the load.
Because of [[Feed-in tariff|laws]] requiring the grid to accept all wind power, the wind companies are paid for this curtailment as if they had nonetheless contributed power to the load.


Notably, curtailment occurs frequently in Great Britain<ref>https://www.wind-watch.org/news/2014/10/28/revealed-as-hurricane-gonzalo-blew-into-uk-energy-firms-were-paid-5m-to-turn-off-their-wind-turbines/</ref><ref>https://www.wind-watch.org/news/2016/08/16/record-penalty-for-electricity-customers/</ref> and Texas<ref>https://www.wind-watch.org/news/2016/08/06/in-texas-oil-country-wind-is-straining-the-grid/</ref>, both with substantial penetration of wind on an isolated grid. Curtailment has been documented also in northern Vermont.<ref>https://www.wind-watch.org/news/2017/09/06/electric-co-op-dont-overload-us-with-renewable-energy-costs/</ref>
Notably, curtailment occurs frequently in Great Britain<ref>https://www.wind-watch.org/news/2014/10/28/revealed-as-hurricane-gonzalo-blew-into-uk-energy-firms-were-paid-5m-to-turn-off-their-wind-turbines/</ref><ref>https://www.wind-watch.org/news/2016/08/16/record-penalty-for-electricity-customers/</ref><ref>https://www.wind-watch.org/news/2017/09/22/exclusive-scottish-onshore-wind-farms-costing-millions-in-constraint-payments/</ref> and Texas<ref>https://www.wind-watch.org/news/2016/08/06/in-texas-oil-country-wind-is-straining-the-grid/</ref>, both with substantial penetration of wind on an isolated grid. Curtailment has been documented also in northern Vermont.<ref>https://www.wind-watch.org/news/2017/09/06/electric-co-op-dont-overload-us-with-renewable-energy-costs/</ref>


<references />
<references />

Revision as of 12:52, 23 September 2017

Up to a small percentage of the total load on a grid, or network of grids tied together by adequate interconnectors, wind power can be integrated with the use of existing reserve capacity, the redundant availability of extra generators kept running – burning fuel but not generating electricity – to be ready to switch to production in case of the sudden failure of other generators. Thus wind power, despite being highly variable, intermittent, and nondispatchable – responding only to the wind, not to actual customer demand – can be taken into the grid, especially during periods of peak load, when there is a greater variety of sources providing power and the grid is therefore more flexible.

As the percentage of wind-generated power on the grid (called its “penetration”) increases, however, the ability of the grid to cope with its unpredictable fluctuations diminishes.

To preserve stability of the electricity supply, grid operators often have to resort to shutting off the wind turbines.

Because of laws requiring the grid to accept all wind power, the wind companies are paid for this curtailment as if they had nonetheless contributed power to the load.

Notably, curtailment occurs frequently in Great Britain[1][2][3] and Texas[4], both with substantial penetration of wind on an isolated grid. Curtailment has been documented also in northern Vermont.[5]