Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Please note that opinion pieces (including letters, editorials, and blogs), reflect the viewpoints of their authors; National Wind Watch does not necessarily agree with them in their entirety or endorse them in any way, nor should it be implied that the writers endorse National Wind Watch.
The State of Iowa is trying to force wind turbines down our throats again!
Credit: Buchanan County Alliance · February 24, 2025 · bucoa.org ~~
Share:
It looks like this site won’t be shutting down as soon as we thought it would. Just when we thought we were safe and we had won our nearly two year long battle (99% of which the community citizens paid for out of their own pockets) to get reasonable protections for non-participating landowners against encroachment of wind turbines on their land, these people are at it again, this time attacking us at the state level.
Iowa Senate Bill SF 376, “A bill for an act relating to the siting and operation of renewable electric power generating facilities,” introduced to the committee on February 19, would strip away ALL local control from communities everywhere in the state to regulate siting and operation of wind turbines within their counties!
Among the prohibitions in this bill?
- Communities may NOT deny a commercial wind energy company a permit to build wind farms within their county.
- Counties may NOT limit the number of wind turbines that a company can construct. You could literally have 300 wind turbines surrounding your house on all sides. (Just look at Adair County, which currently has no fewer than 532 wind turbines!)
- Counties may NOT use CSR (Corn Suitability Rating) as a criteria to determine where wind farms can be constructed (a direct attack on the regulation we just passed in Buchanan County).
- Counties may NOT require a distance from a neighbor’s home of more than 3 times the height of the turbine (even though detached blades can fly MUCH farther than this).
- Counties may NOT require a distance of more than 1 and 1/10th the height of the turbine from a neighbor’s property line.
Make no mistake, Senate Bill SF 376 was not written by the Senate, but by wind energy companies for THEIR benefit and to line THEIR pockets. As I have demonstrated with proven statistics in many previous articles on this site, wind turbines do NOT create jobs, and they do NOT lower electricity rates. In fact, the opposite is true. Electricity rates invariably go up to pay for the cost of these projects. These companies don’t even care about the land owners who sign leases with them!
This is no longer a battle that only affects a few counties in Iowa. It has escalated into total war that affects everyone who lives in Iowa. Furthermore, it is a DIRECT, BLATANT and downright UNETHICAL assault on Iowa Code 352.1 that specifically gives local control to communities to regulate business, land use, and energy production in their counties. In fact, Iowa Code 352.1 specifically states:
“It is the intent of the general assembly to provide local citizens and local governments the means by which agricultural land may be protected from nonagricultural development pressures.“
What you need to do:
- Carpet bomb your local representatives and senators. Tell them to vote NO on SF 376.
- Write to President Donald Trump and ask him to immediately issue an executive order that all federal subsidies for wind turbines/renewable energy projects be examined and revoked where possible.*
Make no mistake, people, we are now in an all out war to protect our way of life and to keep big corporate interests and big government out of controlling how we choose to use land in our local counties. And it affects everyone who lives in Iowa.
*NWW note: The language of the “Inflation Reduction Act,” which extended the tax subsidies to projects “begun” before January 1, 2025, repeatedly limits them to facilities “with a maximum net output of less than 1 megawatt”. For example, Part 1 §13101(f)(B)(i) and §13102(k)(9)(B)(i). That would appear to make virtually every facility in the country, on land and sea, ineligible.
[Update, March 7: The bill has reportedly died in committee. Klimesh has vowed to re-introduce it whenever possible.]
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
![]() (via Stripe) |
![]() (via Paypal) |