LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME




[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Study measures seabirds’ habitat loss as a result of wind turbines 

Credit:  Wageningen Marine Research · January 17, 2025 · wur.nl ~~

A Wageningen Marine Research study shows that razorbills and guillemots on the North Sea avoid wind parks in their flight path. The study uses a new statistical method to determine the effect of wind parks on the spatial distribution of seabirds.

The rapid growth of offshore wind parks in the North Sea necessitates a better understanding of the impact of wind turbines on marine species. The classical method was for researchers to conduct a census of the bird population in the wind park using aeroplanes and ships and subsequently compare the results with those obtained in nearby similar areas. ‘We would see the differences, which are always present when two areas are compared, but we could never be certain that the differences were caused by the presence of wind turbines’, says researcher Mardik Leopold.

The new method has researchers conduct eight censuses from aeroplanes at a considerable altitude, which enables them to determine the population density of the birds in a 25-kilometre radius around the wind park using advanced image processing methods. A new statistical method is then used to determine the size and intensity of the disturbance, where the surrounding area is used as a control area.

Lower density of guillemots and razorbills

The researchers discovered that the density of guillemots (Uria aalge) and razorbills (Alca torda) was much lower in the wind parks than in the surrounding area. Their densities dropped by approximately one and one-and-a-half birds per square kilometre under the influence of the wind park. These two bird species are highly common in the North Sea region. Leopold: ‘We were also able to determine until what distance from the park the seabirds are affected by the park, which is to say: have lower population densities. For guillemots, that range is no less than 10 kilometres.’

Seabirds’ habitat loss

Thus, researchers have mapped the seabirds’ habitat loss for the first time, within and outside of a wind park in the Dutch North Sea. Leopold: ‘This study does not concern fatalities due to collisions with wind turbines, but habitat loss, which is potentially much more detrimental to seabirds than fatalities that occur through collisions. Habitat loss is a permanent situation; the seabirds’ living space is reduced, while a new generation can replace birds that perish through collisions.’

According to Leopold, the method developed by Wageningen Marine Research should be elevated to the standard for measuring the impact of wind parks on seabirds. But is habitat loss problematic if the birds fly around the offshore parks? Leopold: ‘The sea available to these birds becomes smaller, their living environment shrinks, but we do not know whether that causes a reduction in their population. That calls for an answer to the question of what precisely the limiting factor is for the razorbill and guillemot population on the North Sea. Their living environment is an option, but it could also be the availability of food or the number of breeding spots. The construction of offshore wind parks appears to be no issue for these species if the latter is the case, but further investigation is needed.

This study was conducted around the Gemini Offshore Wind Park, some 55 kilometres north of Schiermonnikoog, a co-financier of the project. The Agri&Food Top Sector also funded the project.

Source:  Wageningen Marine Research · January 17, 2025 · wur.nl

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI BS M TS TG Share

Tag: Wildlife


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Bluesky Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab