LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Community outraged over possible multidecade project near local landmark 

Credit:  Tim Clouser | The Center Square | Apr 29, 2024 | thecentersquare.com ~~

Whitman County residents are up in the air over a proposed wind farm that would cost approximately $300 million to build.

The Whitman County Board of Commissioners held meetings on Monday to discuss the project and hear community members’ pleas to protect their landmark. County Planner Alan Thomson said an extensive process would ensue once applications are filed.

The proposed Harvest Hills Wind Project could provide power to 90,000 homes for 25 to 30 years as part of the state’s goal of reaching 100% clean energy by 2045.

The company spearheading the controversial project wants to break ground near Kamiak Butte, a National Natural Landmark park that has more than five miles of forested hiking trails and offers a panoramic view of the Palouse region in eastern Washington near the border of Idaho.

Steelhead Americas, a Portland-based company owned by Vestas American Wind Technology, has yet to file applications for its proposed wind farm. However, Thomson said that once it has, the county will issue a public notice to local media and begin a scoping process.

An opposition group involving hundreds of residents has responded to the proposal. Around 1,600 people have joined the Facebook group, and the same number have signed a petition against the project.

Gwen Anderson, a resident and author of the petition, alleged that landowners around Kamiak Butte have already begun signing leases with Steelhead Americas for the project. She estimated the 45 wind turbines to stand around 670 feet tall, higher than the ridgeline.

“Prime Palouse soil will be removed and paved over for access roads, transmission lines will be built, and tons of concrete and steel will be placed deep into the Palouse soil for each turbine,” Anderson said in the petition, “which are known to leak oil, cause fires, and kill wildlife, and will destroy the enjoyment of our natural recreational sites and neighboring residential properties.

Local farmer Greg Jones spoke in favor of the project during Monday’s meeting and said he’s among the few who have already signed lease agreements.

“I like government services,” Jones said, “and I would prefer somebody else pay for them other than me.”

Jones tossed aside the argument that turbines would ruin the view of Kamiak Butte. He cited a television tower near the landmark that Washington State University installed years ago. While the project was a big deal when proposed, no one mentions it now, and the view is fine, he said.

Pullman resident Tom Thompson said the whole ordeal is somewhat shady.

“Leases have been signed, all these dollars dangled in front of farmers,” Thompson said. “The general public is oblivious to this.”

He questions whether the community understands the magnitude of the project’s impact. Thompson said he wants Vestas to address the community upfront rather than make moves behind the scenes.

“When they recover it, it’s probably going to be concrete, gravel and clay. That precious topsoil,” Thompson said, “that ain’t going to be going back in place. If I was a betting man, I’d bet money on that.”

Editor’s note: After publication, a representative of Steelhead Americas reached out to take issue with Gwen Anderson’s quote. Steelhead Americas maintains that each turbine occupies less than half an acre; turbines will use the latest technology to monitor performance and prevent problems before they arise; alternative energy sources help birds and other wildlife; and studies show wind farms do not have long-term negative effects on property values.

Source:  Tim Clouser | The Center Square | Apr 29, 2024 | thecentersquare.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI BS M TS TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Bluesky Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab