LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

MPs in France say wind turbines must not add to ‘visual saturation’ 

Credit:  10 December 2022 By Hannah Thompson | connexionfrance.com ~~

MPs in France have supported a legal bill stating that any wind farm or installation of wind turbines must take into account “visual saturation”, to avoid damage to landscape views.

Renaissance MP and former Ecological Transition Minister Barbara Pompili admitted that the issue was a “contentious can of worms” and said she realised that it would open the door to all “the anti-wind turbine” campaigners.

However, the bill does not ban wind turbines, and recognises the need to “diversify” energy production sources.

Green MP Delphine Batho said that the proposed law authorises the installation of wind turbines, but that any plans for a new farm must take into account the “number of facilities already existing in the territory concerned”, in order to “diversify sources of renewable energy locally” and “to prevent the effects of visual saturation”.

‘Endless litigation’

Some MPs have criticised the plan.

Renaissance MP and rapporteur on the bill, Pierre Cazeneuve, proposed an amendment, stating that the current law already “satisfied” this criteria. He said that the spirit of the bill “went against legislation” seeking to develop more renewable energy sources.

He stated: “You’re introducing new criteria – the mix of energy and ‘saturation’ – which are not defined in hard law. You are leaving the door open to endless litigation.”

Ecology Minister Agnès Pannier-Runacher also said she feared the new rule would be a “lever to create contention”.

However, MPs from left-wing alliance Nupes, as well as from les Républicains, le Rassemblement Nationale, and a handful of MPs from the ruling party, voted against getting rid of the measure. 

Yet, during the same session, the presidential party pushed back on attempts from some MPs to reinstate an amendment that would require approval from l’Architecte des Bâtiments de France for any wind turbine project located within 10km of a historic monument.

Source:  10 December 2022 By Hannah Thompson | connexionfrance.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky