LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Liquidators appointed to wind turbine services firm 

Credit:  Tuesday, 29 Nov 2022 rte.ie ~~

The company was insolvent and unable to pay its debts as they fall due, the judge said.

The High Court has appointed joint provisional liquidators to an Irish-based firm that is part of a group of companies that provides mechanical and electrical services to power generating wind turbines manufacturers.

The appointments were made in respect of Windhoist Ireland Limited, which had been working on a windfarm project, currently under construction at Ardderroo, near Moycullen in Co Galway.

The firm has 17 employees in Ireland.

The court heard that the wind-up order was being sought because the company’s Scottish-based parent Windhoist, which is part of Windlogix Group, was entering administration in that jurisdiction and it could no longer provide funds for the Irish entity.

This meant that the Irish entity, and other firms within the group, lack sufficient cash to pay the employees in Ireland and in the other locations, the court also heard.

Companies within the group had been working on several projects, in locations including Finland and Taiwan as well as Galway.

However, it claims that the contracts had become unprofitable.

This was due to factors including the higher-than-expected operating costs, and the withholding of moneys due under the contracts by customers due to factors such as weather-related delays.

The parent company also owns and provided a significant amount of plant and machinery, including cranes to the Irish entity so it could carry it out its work.

Arising out of the parent’s decision to enter administration that plant would no longer be available to the Irish company, the court heard.

While the Galway project was not specifically loss making, the lack of funds from the parent or the ability to use the machinery owned by the parent, meant that the Irish firm is now insolvent and cannot continue to perform its contractual obligations.

At the High Court Mr Justice Brian O’Moore said that he was satisfied to appoint Nicholas O’Dwyer of Grant Thornton Ireland and Stuart Preston of Grant Thornton UK as joint provisional liquidators to the company.

The company he said was insolvent and unable to pay its debts as they fall due.

The company, represented by Niall Buckley Bl, petitioned the High Court for the appointments on the grounds that it was the only alternative open to the company, given its financial dependence on the parent company.

It is anticipated that all of the contracts which it had been working will come to an end and most if not all of the company’s employees will be made redundant.

Following the parent firm’s decision to enter administration steps will be needed to secure the group’s assets in different jurisdictions its subsidiaries have been operating in.

The Irish company’s current creditors include its own shareholder which is owed €7m by way of intracompany loans, Revenue, which is owed over €600,000 and trade creditors who are owed €139,000.

Given the close relationship between the Irish company and its Scottish-based parent it was in the best interests of all the parties that joint provisional liquidators, who are based in the two locations, are put in place to help ensure that there was an orderly winding up of the business, counsel said.

The matter will return before the court in December.

Source:  Tuesday, 29 Nov 2022 rte.ie

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky