[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

A common sense solution to wind turbine zoning for Montcalm Township  

Credit:  GUEST VIEW: A common sense solution to wind turbine zoning for Montcalm Township | By Richard D. Palmer and Jemery M. Palmer | Daily News | July 23, 2022 | www.thedailynews.cc ~~

As the dust begins to settle from the chaos resulting from Apex Clean Energy’s massive commercial wind turbine proposal for Montcalm County, a practical solution to zoning ordinance provisions for Montcalm Township has emerged. It is protective, popular, community-based, legally sound, reasonable and should satisfy almost everyone.

The three townships in Montcalm County that adjoin Montcalm Township have all adopted wind ordinances. Sidney, Eureka and Pine townships have adopted ordinances that are protective of their residents and their rural lifestyle, have been approved by multiple attorneys as reasonable and not exclusionary and are extremely popular with their residents. Although responsibly-sited commercial wind turbines are permitted in these townships, a battalion of the incredibly large and powerful Apex-proposed wind turbines will not invade these townships. Conversely, those townships that have adopted irresponsible, unprotective wind ordinances have been plagued with recalls and referendums. Winfield Township is just another recent example.

As Montcalm Township is situated in the middle of Sidney, Eureka, and Pine townships, it makes sense to adopt similar, uniform provisions. It also simplifies the work of the Planning Commission and the Township Board. They can use (as Pine Township did) the Sidney Township ordinance as a model (or they can use the Eureka Township ordinance as a model), and add to it any additional protections appropriate for Montcalm Township.

Instead, the Montcalm Township Planning Commission has used a model ordinance that has (at least) 32 inconsistencies within the ordinance, inconsistencies with the current zoning ordinance, contradictions, legal issues, omissions and errors, and (at least) eight insufficiently-protective provisions. Although the Planning Commission was made aware of these problems, they addressed none of them. Instead, they only made a few changes – which actually further reduced the protections for township residents.

It is time for the Montcalm Township Planning Commission to work on a wind ordinance that will protect the township residents from the well-documented serious adverse health effects (for people and animals) that can be caused by commercial wind turbines, the significant (up to 25% to 43%) reduction in residential property values, the destruction of our unique and beautiful landscape and rural lifestyle, and the incredibly powerful turbines Apex intends to build in Montcalm County, which are more than twice as powerful as the commercial wind turbines currently standing in Michigan.

It is time for the Montcalm Township Board to encourage the Planning Commission to do so and to appoint members to the Planning Commission that will work diligently to protect the health, safety and welfare of the township residents. And it is time for all of the residents of Montcalm Township to require our public servants to truly serve the public, and adopt a wind ordinance that is in our best interests – as our neighboring townships have already done.

Richard D. Palmer and Jemery M. Palmer are Montcalm Township residents and landowners for the past 44 years

The opinions expressed in the Guest View do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Daily News.

Source:  GUEST VIEW: A common sense solution to wind turbine zoning for Montcalm Township | By Richard D. Palmer and Jemery M. Palmer | Daily News | July 23, 2022 | www.thedailynews.cc

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: