[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Hancock County bans wind, solar  

Credit:  Lou Wilin | The Advertiser-Tribune | Apr 21, 2022 | advertiser-tribune.com ~~

FINDLAY – The Hancock County Board of Commissioners on Tuesday voted to ban solar and wind farms from much of Hancock County.

The ban takes effect May 19 and would apply to all of Hancock County except Findlay, the villages and Biglick Township, on the county’s far east side.

The ban could hinder economic and job growth because companies increasingly want wind or solar power, said Findlay-Hancock County Economic Development Director Tim Mayle.

The ban does not apply to two proposed solar projects – one in Cass Township, the other in Washington Township – currently being considered for approval by the Ohio Power Siting Board. That’s because those projects were proposed before a new state law allowing county boards of commissioners to ban wind and solar projects.

Voting for the widespread ban were Commissioners Michael Pepple and William Bateson. Opposed was Commissioner Timothy Bechtol.

The prospect of new solar and wind projects has sparked fierce opposition among many county residents.

Over 20 people attended Tuesday’s meeting. Nine residents voiced support for the ban. They have expressed fears that solar farms would take farm land out of use and ruin it; cause drainage problems and flooding; disturb gas and oil wells; contaminate water wells; harm wildlife; and reduce property values.

Fifteen of Hancock County’s townships passed resolutions asking the commissioners to completely ban all such projects. Only Biglick and Blanchard townships did not.

Bechtol, who voted against the ban, has warned solar and wind opponents that the resolution approved Tuesday could be overruled by a referendum vote of the people. Bechtol would prefer the commissioners consider wind and solar farm proposals on a case-by-case basis. Their decisions in those cases would not be subject to referendum.

If the commissioners considered each wind and solar proposal on its own merits, they still could protect residents’ interests, he said.

Tuesday’s vote is subject to a referendum. But if a referendum would occur, its proponents would have to mount a petition drive soon. The ban would begin May 19, or 30 days after the commissioners’ vote, unless the commissioners would be presented referendum petitions containing the signatures of 2,275 registered Hancock County voters.

The number 2,275 represents 8% of the total votes cast in Hancock County for all candidates for governor in 2018.

Source:  Lou Wilin | The Advertiser-Tribune | Apr 21, 2022 | advertiser-tribune.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: