Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Laois councillors stand their ground in opposition to windfarm distances
Credit: By Joe Barrett | Laois Nationalist | Saturday, January 29, 2022 | laois-nationalist.ie ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Councillors once again rejected council management’s recommendation for wind farms in Laois to be located 500 metres from homes.
During the discussions on the draft County Development Plan (CDP) 2021-2027 councillors defied the recommendation of the county’s Chief Executive John Mullholland to allow wind turbines to be erected 500 metres from homes.
Mr Mulholland said that the submission from councillors to have wind turbines setback 1.5 kilometres had been rejected by the Office of the Planning Regulator (OPR) who oversees CDPs and ensures that they are in line with regional and national interim guidelines on renewable energy. He said that the OPR had rejected their submission and was recommending the 500 metres set back distance should be included in the county’s new development plan.
“I propose the 1.5km set back distance remains. I propose that it should not be removed from our previous CDP. Everyone is in favour of renewable energy but not when it effects people’s homes” said cllr Pádriag Fleming.
Cllr Ben Brennan seconded the proposal.
The council’s Director of Services Angela McEvoy said that the same proposal by councillors in 2017 had been overturned by Ministerial Directive and that the national set back guidelines for wind turbines is 500 metres.
“We want regulations, not guidelines,” said cllr Aisling Moran.
Cllr Pádraig Fleming had previously proposed a 1.5km setback distance for commercial/industrial sized wind farms from schools, dwellings, community centres, public roads and farms that is in the current County Development Plan.
Cllr Fleming’s proposal to reject the chief executive’s recommendation and adopt the 1.5km setback distance was unanimously approved by all councillors present at the meeting on Tuesday 25 January.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: