[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Baker pushes big change in offshore wind pricing  

Credit:  WBUR | January 11, 2022 | www.wbur.org ~~

The Massachusetts legislature is considering a Baker administration proposal to significantly change the way the state invests in and regulates the growing offshore wind industry.

Gov. Baker’s bill – which he proposed last fall – would put $750 million of federal relief money towards clean energy research and investment, and change the way electricity from offshore wind farms is priced.

The state currently has a price cap for offshore wind, meaning new projects have to produce electricity below a certain cost.

Baker wants to remove that cap entirely. At a legislative hearing Tuesday, Baker argued the price cap worked well in the industry’s early years, but technological advancements and new competition from other states have made it obsolete.

“As we look to the next phase of our offshore wind strategy, this legislation would also ensure that Massachusetts remains on the leading edge of offshore wind policy in the U.S. … while continuing to ensure that the pricing that’s available saves ratepayers money,” he said.

But not everybody is on board with Baker’s proposal.

State Sen. Michael Barrett, the co-chair of the Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy, argued the cap has kept the price per kilowatt-hour from Massachusetts projects lower than in neighboring states, like New York and Connecticut.

“My request to you is that you not walk away from the wisdom that has assured us getting a break today,” he told Baker.

The conservative-leaning Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance is also opposing Baker’s bill.

“The price cap is a safeguard for Massachusetts residents, and it needs to be protected at all costs,” spokesperson Paul Diego Craney said in a statement. “While many affluent [ratepayers] in Massachusetts would be happy to pay higher energy prices, most of middle class Massachusetts cannot afford it.”

Advocacy groups like the Environmental League of Massachusetts argue the focus on low costs have come at the expense of other investments, like commitments to job training and infrastructure development.

“The cheapest solution, or the cheapest project that doesn’t include storage, for example, is not always the smartest project,” said Susannah Hatch, ELM’s clean energy coalition director. “So economic development is certainly part of this picture.”

Baker’s offshore wind bill is not the only offshore wind proposal circulating through the legislature.

A House bill supported by House Speaker Ron Mariano would also remove the state’s offshore wind project price cap, and essentially pivot the state from focusing mostly on cost towards other aspects of the bids, like job creation and long-term economic development.

Energy and climate policy has been one of the issues under intense negotiation right up until the end of formal sessions in each of the last three legislative sessions, and Tuesday’s hearing suggests that the current session could be fourth to conclude with an update to offshore wind policy in Massachusetts.

With reporting from WBUR’s Walter Wuthmann and State House News Services’ Colin A. Young

Source:  WBUR | January 11, 2022 | www.wbur.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch