LOCATION/TYPE

News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Anger over rush to develop wind farms in rich fishing grounds  

Credit:  By Keith Findlay | The Press and Journal | December 8, 2021 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Plans to locate offshore wind farms in rich fishing grounds are being rushed through without proper consultation, it has been claimed.

Shetland fishers have highlighted a series of glaring flaws in the process for identifying suitable sites for the turbines needed to power oil and gas installations west of the islands.

One bone of contention is in the data being used for current and historical fishing activity in the areas under consideration.

Shetland Fishermen’s Association (SFA) says this is limited to bottom trawling and excludes other methods of fishing, including seine netting, pelagic hauls, gillnetting and longlining.

The association is also alarmed the data covers only activity involving Scottish fishing boats, ignoring those of vessels from the rest of the UK, the EU, Norway and Faroe.

SFA’s concerns relate to the Scottish Government’s Innovation and Targeted Oil and Gas (INTOG) leasing round.

Developers have been invited to apply for the right to build offshore wind farms specifically for the purpose of providing low carbon electricity to offshore oil and gas installations.

INTOG is separate from the ScotWind auction – run by Crown Estate Scotland, for potential offshore wind farms for domestic and commercial electricity production.

Industry ‘hugely concerned’

SFA policy officer Sheila Keith said: “The Shetland fishing industry depends on these rich grounds to the west of the islands for catching, and is hugely concerned that proper assessment of the potential impact of INTOG offshore wind on fishing is not being made.

“While the fishing industry will always support the aim of lowering carbon emissions, the INTOG consultation is being rushed through with scant attention to detail – unlike ScotWind, which involved widespread and detailed consultation.

“These are vast areas, with water depths of up to 200m (656ft).

“Floating wind technologies are in their infancy for those sorts of conditions and developers readily concede that technological solutions will not be available until after 2030.”

Ms Keith added: “The whole process should be slowed down so that the industry can gather and fully assess fishing data from these areas.

“That way, existing fishing opportunities and activities can be safeguarded as required in the National Marine Plan.”

A government spokesman said: “We need bold action to tackle the climate emergency.

“Renewable energy, including offshore wind, will deliver good, green jobs, benefits for communities and strengthened energy security as we transition to becoming a net-zero nation.

“We want to ensure a constructive relationship between fishers and offshore wind developers in relation to the development of offshore wind energy in Scottish waters.

“Our sectoral marine planning process for offshore renewable energy, which identifies potential areas for future development, involves fishing representatives being invited to join the relevant governance groups, in order to help inform the location of any resultant development areas.”

The spokesman added: “The INTOG leasing round is still in the early stages and there are multiple more stages where stakeholders can express their views to help inform the planning process.

“A public consultation was held on the areas of search and the planning specification.

“This will be followed by a detailed environmental and socio-economic assessment to determine if a project should proceed to a draft plan, at which point it would then be subject to further consultation.”

Source:  By Keith Findlay | The Press and Journal | December 8, 2021 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: