LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Glenkens windfarm gets the green light 

Credit:  The Scottish Government's decision has been slammed by the Save Our Hills campaign group. | By Stuart Gillespie | Daily Record | 16 Nov 2021 | www.dailyrecord.co.uk ~~

Holyrood officials claim a new Glenkens windfarm won’t be detrimental to the landscape – because there’s already another development nearby.

The Scottish Government has given Energiekontor the thumbs up for nine turbines at Fell Hill near Loch Urr.

In his decision, reporter Chris Norman acknowledged concerns over the impact the windmills – some as tall as 200m – would have on the landscape but felt these would be “offset to a substantial degree by both the existing impact of Blackcraig Wind Farm and the lower contours where the proposed turbines would be sited”.

The decision has been slammed by the Save Our Hills campaign group.

Spokesman Iain Milligan said: “The basis of the Scottish Government’s decision seems to be that, because another windfarm already dominates the landscape, an extension of it is largely irrelevant.”

The Fell Hill development is one of six Glenkens windfarm developments that have been the subject of an appeal to the Scottish Government since August last year – all because the council had failed to make a decision within the required timeframe.

The application – for seven 200m tall turbines and two at 180m – was lodged with the council in February last year.

In his report, Mr Norman noted that due to the pandemic “the council’s landscape architect was unable to fully review the proposal nor undertake site work in relation to the appeal but she concludes that relatively localised but significant and unacceptable effects would occur” from a number of viewpoints.

And Mr Norman acknowledged “that Loch Urr is regarded as a precious and locally important landscape feature, and even a ‘national treasure’, as described by persons opposing the proposed development”.

However, he felt that the plans for nine turbines “would not diminish, to an unacceptable degree, the appreciation of the vertical scale of Fell Hill, given the presence of the operational turbines and the lower contours on which they would be sited”.

He said he put “considerable weight” on the fact the Blackcraig Wind Farm was already in the area, describing it as “a notable man made intervention into the landscape”.

As a result, the Fell Hill turbines would not be “within an area of unchanged landscape that is otherwise without manmade intervention”.

And he believed the Energiekontor proposal, which the German firm claims represents a £61 million investment, would not have a significant impact on tourist and visitor attractions.

Mr Norman granted approval of the development but attached a string of conditions.

Mr Milligan from Save Our Hills described the fact a Scottish Government reporter had been allowed to approve the proposal without it being discussed by the council’s planning applications committee as “an unacceptable failure of the democratic
process”.

He added: “We need councils and governments to control energy policy responsibly, striking a fairer balance between reducing carbon emissions and preserving the landscape and wildlife.

“It is unacceptable for officials in Edinburgh repeatedly to dictate what communities in rural Scotland should and shouldn’t have to live with.”

Source:  The Scottish Government's decision has been slammed by the Save Our Hills campaign group. | By Stuart Gillespie | Daily Record | 16 Nov 2021 | www.dailyrecord.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky